From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References Needed

There is only one source for the article and nothing specifically for "anti-razor" which says that when two things are not sufficient to prove a proposition, a third thing will be necessary. How is this in opposition to "plurality should not be posited without necessity"? JimCubb ( talk) 21:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References Needed

There is only one source for the article and nothing specifically for "anti-razor" which says that when two things are not sufficient to prove a proposition, a third thing will be necessary. How is this in opposition to "plurality should not be posited without necessity"? JimCubb ( talk) 21:19, 22 July 2010 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook