This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Canada: British Columbia / Vancouver Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject British Columbia. This article is supported by WikiProject Vancouver (assessed as Low-importance). Hotels This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Insufficient content for a separate article; arguably South Tower not notable in its own right Waggers TALK 07:39, 24 September 2015 (UTC) reply

I agree, but it's very confusing. There is a complex of three buildings, and two of them already had pages which replicated each other quite a bit. It made the most sense to create a central page for the whole complex, I followed the example of Brookfield Place (New York City), a complex of multiple buildings, each of which has its own page.However the hotel is located in two of the three buildings. If the shorter tower loses its page, I'm fine with that, it doesn't seem especially notable. I just didn't want to delete it on my own. Jamesluckard TALK 07:43, 24 September 2015 (UTC) reply