![]() | Walking Home: Travels with a Troubadour on the Pennine Way has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 9, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs) 03:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm reviewing this article as part of the June Backlog drive.
A lovely article about what's probably a lovely book. I just graduated from an MA English program, so it's nice to read a WP article about poetry and a poet; makes me want to go out and buy this book and Armitage's poetry along with it. There is very little "wrong" with this article. It's a little short, almost too short for a GA, so I wonder if you could expand it? I will AGF that it's broad enough, though. The prose is sound and adequate for a GA. I also wonder if instead of one of the quote boxes, you could include an image of Armitage. Love the map. I have no problem with the tone; the article is neutral. No evidence of edit warring.
I did go through and check the references I could access. I AGF about the references from the book.
I found two ref problems:
Once you fix the refs, I will promote to GA. Nice job; keep up the good work. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 04:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Walking Home: Travels with a Troubadour on the Pennine Way has been listed as one of the
Language and literature good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: June 9, 2022. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Figureskatingfan ( talk · contribs) 03:05, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
Hi, I'm reviewing this article as part of the June Backlog drive.
A lovely article about what's probably a lovely book. I just graduated from an MA English program, so it's nice to read a WP article about poetry and a poet; makes me want to go out and buy this book and Armitage's poetry along with it. There is very little "wrong" with this article. It's a little short, almost too short for a GA, so I wonder if you could expand it? I will AGF that it's broad enough, though. The prose is sound and adequate for a GA. I also wonder if instead of one of the quote boxes, you could include an image of Armitage. Love the map. I have no problem with the tone; the article is neutral. No evidence of edit warring.
I did go through and check the references I could access. I AGF about the references from the book.
I found two ref problems:
Once you fix the refs, I will promote to GA. Nice job; keep up the good work. Christine (Figureskatingfan) ( talk) 04:46, 9 June 2022 (UTC)