![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is undoubtedly a pop-rap song. Stop reverting it to hip-hop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blsupr ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Nice attitude you have there bud. Since when are genres sourced? ~~nope~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blsupr ( talk • contribs) 08:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Genres have always needed a source. They are not supposed to be based of the opinion of the editor. That would fall under original research. Bowling is life ( talk) 13:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Why did no one capitalize the first genre? That's giving me an aneurysm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souljia 1991 ( talk • contribs) 20:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Also, I agree with the other guy who thinks this is pop-rap. There are definitely elements of pop-rap in the song, but still, please cite appropriate sources. Souljia 1991 ( talk) 20:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
This is not up for debate. All of his other lead singles charted in the top 10 except "Just Don't Give a Fuck" in 1999. It is sourced with his complete chart history. Another editor already agrees. The two of you fanboying and trying to get me blocked for providing information with a reliable source is ridiculous. The only people edit warring are the ones erasing information from the commercial performance section. BlaccCrab ( talk) 00:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
I and at least one other editors reverted the addition of a track listing by a person using a dynamic IP. This is a dispute that has affected at least two other Eminem articles. See River (Eminem song) and Nowhere Fast (Eminem song). In both instances, discussions were opened on the respective talk page but ignored by the IP editor. Notices directing the IP to the discussion were also placed on the IP's talk pages, but we're ignored. I'm placing this note here to explain the background of the reversion, and note that the editors reverting the IP's edits are doing so because the track listing is redundant. I'm also giving the IP yet another chance to respond, but I also have little confidence that they will. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 04:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is undoubtedly a pop-rap song. Stop reverting it to hip-hop. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blsupr ( talk • contribs) 23:15, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Nice attitude you have there bud. Since when are genres sourced? ~~nope~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Blsupr ( talk • contribs) 08:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Genres have always needed a source. They are not supposed to be based of the opinion of the editor. That would fall under original research. Bowling is life ( talk) 13:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Why did no one capitalize the first genre? That's giving me an aneurysm. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Souljia 1991 ( talk • contribs) 20:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Also, I agree with the other guy who thinks this is pop-rap. There are definitely elements of pop-rap in the song, but still, please cite appropriate sources. Souljia 1991 ( talk) 20:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
This is not up for debate. All of his other lead singles charted in the top 10 except "Just Don't Give a Fuck" in 1999. It is sourced with his complete chart history. Another editor already agrees. The two of you fanboying and trying to get me blocked for providing information with a reliable source is ridiculous. The only people edit warring are the ones erasing information from the commercial performance section. BlaccCrab ( talk) 00:02, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
I and at least one other editors reverted the addition of a track listing by a person using a dynamic IP. This is a dispute that has affected at least two other Eminem articles. See River (Eminem song) and Nowhere Fast (Eminem song). In both instances, discussions were opened on the respective talk page but ignored by the IP editor. Notices directing the IP to the discussion were also placed on the IP's talk pages, but we're ignored. I'm placing this note here to explain the background of the reversion, and note that the editors reverting the IP's edits are doing so because the track listing is redundant. I'm also giving the IP yet another chance to respond, but I also have little confidence that they will. Aoi (青い) ( talk) 04:58, 24 April 2019 (UTC)