This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wal-Mart employee and labor relations redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was split from Debates over Wal-Mart. Any history prior to March 26, 2006 can be found in that article, and some material was previously split from the main Wal-Mart article. -- MisterHand 21:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
The Wisconsin legislature paragraph is almost entirely a wal-mart response. What was trying to be passed and how would it have affected Wal-Mart and other employers?
I have proposed a major change involving this article, see Talk:Criticism of Wal-Mart#List of criticisms of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. for rationale. Tuxide 17:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
As per Talk:Wal-Mart workforce diversity. Tuxide 19:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I vote to keep as it is. A court finding has direct application to the question raised in the prior section. It is on topic and on point.-- Lepeu1999 18:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I am proposing the merges and splits on this article. Content about class action suits should get their own [[whatever v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.]] articles and have links provided from whatever is considered to be the main Wal-Mart article in this situation. Also, I strongly disagree that this article should exist. Tuxide 20:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The Wal-Mart workforce diversity article has now been merged into this article. Dr. Cash 00:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Wal-Mart employee and labor relations redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was split from Debates over Wal-Mart. Any history prior to March 26, 2006 can be found in that article, and some material was previously split from the main Wal-Mart article. -- MisterHand 21:36, 26 March 2006 (UTC)
The Wisconsin legislature paragraph is almost entirely a wal-mart response. What was trying to be passed and how would it have affected Wal-Mart and other employers?
I have proposed a major change involving this article, see Talk:Criticism of Wal-Mart#List of criticisms of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. for rationale. Tuxide 17:06, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
As per Talk:Wal-Mart workforce diversity. Tuxide 19:04, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
I vote to keep as it is. A court finding has direct application to the question raised in the prior section. It is on topic and on point.-- Lepeu1999 18:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
I am proposing the merges and splits on this article. Content about class action suits should get their own [[whatever v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.]] articles and have links provided from whatever is considered to be the main Wal-Mart article in this situation. Also, I strongly disagree that this article should exist. Tuxide 20:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The Wal-Mart workforce diversity article has now been merged into this article. Dr. Cash 00:53, 6 October 2006 (UTC)