This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Articles for creation This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles This article was accepted from this draft on 14 December 2017 by reviewer Jcc ( talk · contribs). Economics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. ( Learn how and when to remove these template messages) This article's lead section contains information that is not included elsewhere in the article. If the information is appropriate for the lead of the article, this information should also be included in the body of the article. (February 2019) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) This article's lead section may be too short to adequately summarize the key points. Please consider expanding the lead to provide an accessible overview of all important aspects of the article. (February 2019) This article provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject. Please help improve the article by providing more context for the reader. (February 2019) ( Learn how and when to remove this message) ( Learn how and when to remove this message)

The above template appeared in the article. I have removed it.

• I don’t see what is gained by repeating in the article information which is already present in the lead para.
• I don’t see the need for a summary given that the contents box is an effective summary in itself.
• Maybe there’s some context which could usefully be added; maybe the person who added the template had arrived at a random article, and wasn’t ideally placed to judge.
• The existence of a template for alleging a fault is no evidence that anything’s wrong.

Colin.champion ( talk) 08:05, 18 March 2019 (UTC) reply