![]() | WWCW has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 30, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the span of three days, a Florida man was approved by bankruptcy courts to buy
TV stations in Roanoke and
Lynchburg, Virginia, and then arrested on charges of laundering millions in drug money? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk ( talk · contribs) 00:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Joint review with
WFXR
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is clear and concise |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
No fiction or words to watch. Substation table is appropriate, lead is well-written. No MOS violations. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Citations are placed in a proper "References" section |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Most citations are to various local newspapers via newspapers.com, no concerns there. Others include official FCC reports and information sites like RabbitEars- also all good. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | I don't see a need for a thorough spotcheck, article is well-cited to varying sources. No OR visible. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no violations |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Addresses the station's early history, time during simulcasting with WFXR, and other technical info. I'll note that "Merger with WVFT" is appropriately transcluded from the article for WFXR. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays focused throughout |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No bias visible |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Image is properly PD tagged. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
Image is relevant; no caption required. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
The result was: promoted by
Vaticidalprophet (
talk)
15:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WFXR; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
Sammi Brie: Nice work on both articles. I just had a concern about the hook, though.
Epicgenius (
talk)
13:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | WWCW has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
August 30, 2023. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in the span of three days, a Florida man was approved by bankruptcy courts to buy
TV stations in Roanoke and
Lynchburg, Virginia, and then arrested on charges of laundering millions in drug money? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk ( talk · contribs) 00:41, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Joint review with
WFXR
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
![]() |
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Prose is clear and concise |
![]() |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
No fiction or words to watch. Substation table is appropriate, lead is well-written. No MOS violations. |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
![]() |
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | Citations are placed in a proper "References" section |
![]() |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | Most citations are to various local newspapers via newspapers.com, no concerns there. Others include official FCC reports and information sites like RabbitEars- also all good. |
![]() |
2c. it contains no original research. | I don't see a need for a thorough spotcheck, article is well-cited to varying sources. No OR visible. |
![]() |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. | Earwig shows no violations |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
![]() |
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | Addresses the station's early history, time during simulcasting with WFXR, and other technical info. I'll note that "Merger with WVFT" is appropriately transcluded from the article for WFXR. |
![]() |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | Stays focused throughout |
![]() |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | No bias visible |
![]() |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No edit warring |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
![]() |
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | Image is properly PD tagged. |
![]() |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. |
Image is relevant; no caption required. |
![]() |
7. Overall assessment. |
The result was: promoted by
Vaticidalprophet (
talk)
15:34, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie ( talk). Self-nominated at 00:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/WFXR; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page. Both articles:
General: Article is new enough and long enough |
---|
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
---|
|
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
@
Sammi Brie: Nice work on both articles. I just had a concern about the hook, though.
Epicgenius (
talk)
13:47, 17 August 2023 (UTC)