This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WT1190F article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from WT1190F appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 November 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the object has been determined to be space junk, the "Infobox planet" should be changed or removed. BatteryIncluded ( talk) 16:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Is this small part of junk is notable? It is just <100 kg junk piece; there were tens of such fragments from every moon mission. Why we should keep the separate article for this one? ` a5b ( talk) 16:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
{{
Infobox event}}
. Hence, a separate article -
Ninney (
talk)
17:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
And also this: "Planetary astronomer Nick Moskovitz of Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff is one of many observers around the world helping to study object WT1190F. He told EarthSky:
'This is one of the first times we have been able to predict, specifically, the time and location of reentry for a piece of space debris. With this information, astronomers will be able to point instruments to that location and study the reentry. Our data have helped to narrow down the point of reentry to a fairly small location out over the Indian Ocean, south of Sri Lanka.' " Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The event was largely rained out with overcast skies and fake videos are spreading. I did see twitter comments that ranulnth and isuranirmal heard it. Looks like it is up to Team Petrus to get images. -- Kheider ( talk) 06:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
WT1190F article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | A fact from WT1190F appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 19 November 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Since the object has been determined to be space junk, the "Infobox planet" should be changed or removed. BatteryIncluded ( talk) 16:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
Is this small part of junk is notable? It is just <100 kg junk piece; there were tens of such fragments from every moon mission. Why we should keep the separate article for this one? ` a5b ( talk) 16:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
{{
Infobox event}}
. Hence, a separate article -
Ninney (
talk)
17:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
And also this: "Planetary astronomer Nick Moskovitz of Lowell Observatory in Flagstaff is one of many observers around the world helping to study object WT1190F. He told EarthSky:
'This is one of the first times we have been able to predict, specifically, the time and location of reentry for a piece of space debris. With this information, astronomers will be able to point instruments to that location and study the reentry. Our data have helped to narrow down the point of reentry to a fairly small location out over the Indian Ocean, south of Sri Lanka.' " Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 05:23, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
The event was largely rained out with overcast skies and fake videos are spreading. I did see twitter comments that ranulnth and isuranirmal heard it. Looks like it is up to Team Petrus to get images. -- Kheider ( talk) 06:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)