![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 24 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gliese 915. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
The result of the move request was: no consensus. After extended time for discussion, a consensus for the proposed move has not emerged. BD2412 T 17:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
WD 2359−434 → Gliese 915 – According to WP:STARNAMES, for stars that have no Bayer or Flamsteed designations, the Henry Draper Catalogue (HD) number, variable-star designation or the Gliese number should be used for the article name about the star. As WD 2359–434 has no HD number or Variable-star designation, the name Gliese 915 should be used. InTheAstronomy32 ( talk) 16:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Betrayals and secteys that hurt the blind partner in relationshipand finding justice for therre pain and side effects ifbthe betrsyal of affairs znd players 216.250.37.52 ( talk) 19:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that
WD 2359−434 be
renamed and moved to
Gliese 915. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
WD 2359−434 → Gliese 915 – Simpler name inline with WP:STARNAMES, which priorizes Gliese designations for stars without proper names, Bayer, Flamsteed, HD or Variable designations. New title meets the naturalness criteria, follow the naming convetion and is consistent with other Gliese stars. 21 Andromedae ( talk) 23:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
![]() | On 24 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gliese 915. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
The result of the move request was: no consensus. After extended time for discussion, a consensus for the proposed move has not emerged. BD2412 T 17:08, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
WD 2359−434 → Gliese 915 – According to WP:STARNAMES, for stars that have no Bayer or Flamsteed designations, the Henry Draper Catalogue (HD) number, variable-star designation or the Gliese number should be used for the article name about the star. As WD 2359–434 has no HD number or Variable-star designation, the name Gliese 915 should be used. InTheAstronomy32 ( talk) 16:43, 24 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. ModernDayTrilobite ( talk • contribs) 16:39, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
Betrayals and secteys that hurt the blind partner in relationshipand finding justice for therre pain and side effects ifbthe betrsyal of affairs znd players 216.250.37.52 ( talk) 19:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
![]() | It has been proposed in this section that
WD 2359−434 be
renamed and moved to
Gliese 915. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{
subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{
requested move/dated}} directly. |
WD 2359−434 → Gliese 915 – Simpler name inline with WP:STARNAMES, which priorizes Gliese designations for stars without proper names, Bayer, Flamsteed, HD or Variable designations. New title meets the naturalness criteria, follow the naming convetion and is consistent with other Gliese stars. 21 Andromedae ( talk) 23:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)