This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Organizations This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United Kingdom This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Family and relationships ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Family and relationships, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Family and relationshipsWikipedia:WikiProject Family and relationshipsTemplate:WikiProject Family and relationshipsFamily and relationships articles

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination: Keep, 7 September 2021, see discussion. keep, 10 January 2011 (UTC), see discussion.

Please would you kindly help make this Wikipedia friendly. I am at a loss what to do in particular having looked at similar entries for other children's and international charities. Many thanks

I note the point about Peacock terms but all such terms are either in references or quotes. I cannot find any unsubstantiated self-promotion as such but happy if others would check too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karim Khan Zand of Shiraz ( talk • contribs) 04:46, 21 October 2009 (UTC) reply

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

The article does not currently cite any sources to establish that this charity is notable. This Google News search throws up just three small mentions in the media:

• George Hosking 'from the Wave Trust' did something
• About 5% of this Times Online article
• One sentence in this Reuters news item

-- John of Reading ( talk) 20:46, 10 January 2011 (UTC) reply

There are two extra sources in the AFD discussion -- John of Reading ( talk) 08:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC) reply