This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about W-18 (drug).
|
The IUPAC used in the image is incorrect. I placed the correct IUPAC into the drugbox, but the incorrect is still shown (and more prominently).
Hammilton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.96.159 ( talk) 13:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
The article read "This makes it likely that it would be legal throughout the world.". The 'legallity' of unscheduled drugs is a gray area in many scenarios and the previous wording (I believe) gives the wrong impression. I rewrote the sentence as "This makes it likely that it would not be illegalized under drug analog laws." The substance could still be illegalized under other laws, and a lack of specific illegalization is not always equivalent to explicit legality. 173.209.172.90 ( talk) 02:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I rarely have a chance to say this, so I will, emphatically. Well done on creating an informative, well-sourced, and timely stub. Cheers, and thanks to all involved. Le Prof Leprof 7272 ( talk) 15:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
just did a search of pubmed, FDA, DEA, CDC, NHS... nothing more on this from MEDRS sources at this time. Jytdog ( talk) 08:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Equinox ◑ 17:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
I used "find in page" on the
citation for the claim of w-18 binding to the hERG channel, however I was unable to find the claim in either that article or
this one, which was cited by the first article. The same error appeared on the page for
Brorphine. I hate to assume bad faith, but I will investigate this issue to see if that could be the case.
Update:
I found the original edit that mentioned hERG. Somehow, the citation was switched. I've fixed this and clarified the claim
(I absolutely butchered the signatures on this)
Towelbin ( talk) 00:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about W-18 (drug).
|
The IUPAC used in the image is incorrect. I placed the correct IUPAC into the drugbox, but the incorrect is still shown (and more prominently).
Hammilton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.117.96.159 ( talk) 13:30, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
The article read "This makes it likely that it would be legal throughout the world.". The 'legallity' of unscheduled drugs is a gray area in many scenarios and the previous wording (I believe) gives the wrong impression. I rewrote the sentence as "This makes it likely that it would not be illegalized under drug analog laws." The substance could still be illegalized under other laws, and a lack of specific illegalization is not always equivalent to explicit legality. 173.209.172.90 ( talk) 02:04, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
I rarely have a chance to say this, so I will, emphatically. Well done on creating an informative, well-sourced, and timely stub. Cheers, and thanks to all involved. Le Prof Leprof 7272 ( talk) 15:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
just did a search of pubmed, FDA, DEA, CDC, NHS... nothing more on this from MEDRS sources at this time. Jytdog ( talk) 08:07, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
Equinox ◑ 17:57, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
I used "find in page" on the
citation for the claim of w-18 binding to the hERG channel, however I was unable to find the claim in either that article or
this one, which was cited by the first article. The same error appeared on the page for
Brorphine. I hate to assume bad faith, but I will investigate this issue to see if that could be the case.
Update:
I found the original edit that mentioned hERG. Somehow, the citation was switched. I've fixed this and clarified the claim
(I absolutely butchered the signatures on this)
Towelbin ( talk) 00:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)