![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Perhaps this article should be renamed Vulnerable areas in Sweden, since the term vulnerable area is not internationally applied. AadaamS ( talk) 17:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
The presnet article for the similar Danish phenomenon is called vulnerable residential area (Denmark), which might also be an inspiration. -- Økonom ( talk) 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Xx236 ( talk) 10:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Keeping the link here: http://www4.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/FC71144625FF4722C12580C30039C45E/$File/09B_Bilaga_Analysrapport_Sarskilt_utsatta_omraden_i_Goteborg.pdf AadaamS ( talk) 05:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
https://www.thelocal.se/20190603/sweden-vulnerable-areas-decrease-positive-trends-police Xx236 ( talk) 12:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC) emergency services do often adapt their behaviour, for example by making sure that there is proper back-up, by entering the areas via alternative routes, or by reversing their vehicles into the areas in order to make sure they are able to leave quickly if needed. Emergency services have, for example, been exposed to threats, stone-throwing, or vandalism of their vehicles. Xx236 ( talk) 12:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I have some questions about this article. The phenomenon of "vulnerable areas" is an international one, certainally not a uniquely Swedish one. As mentioned in the Million Programme article, the programme may have created a lot of these issues, but that is comprehensively if briefly mentioned there. I'd move to delete this article and merge it with Million Programme as one solution. Another could be to include it as a section in ghetto or No-go_area. Totorotroll ( talk) 10:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Perhaps this article should be renamed Vulnerable areas in Sweden, since the term vulnerable area is not internationally applied. AadaamS ( talk) 17:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
The presnet article for the similar Danish phenomenon is called vulnerable residential area (Denmark), which might also be an inspiration. -- Økonom ( talk) 13:12, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
Xx236 ( talk) 10:15, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Keeping the link here: http://www4.goteborg.se/prod/Intraservice/Namndhandlingar/SamrumPortal.nsf/FC71144625FF4722C12580C30039C45E/$File/09B_Bilaga_Analysrapport_Sarskilt_utsatta_omraden_i_Goteborg.pdf AadaamS ( talk) 05:59, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
https://www.thelocal.se/20190603/sweden-vulnerable-areas-decrease-positive-trends-police Xx236 ( talk) 12:12, 26 June 2020 (UTC) emergency services do often adapt their behaviour, for example by making sure that there is proper back-up, by entering the areas via alternative routes, or by reversing their vehicles into the areas in order to make sure they are able to leave quickly if needed. Emergency services have, for example, been exposed to threats, stone-throwing, or vandalism of their vehicles. Xx236 ( talk) 12:13, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
I have some questions about this article. The phenomenon of "vulnerable areas" is an international one, certainally not a uniquely Swedish one. As mentioned in the Million Programme article, the programme may have created a lot of these issues, but that is comprehensively if briefly mentioned there. I'd move to delete this article and merge it with Million Programme as one solution. Another could be to include it as a section in ghetto or No-go_area. Totorotroll ( talk) 10:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)