![]() | Vought XSO2U has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 22, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although the
Vought XSO2U (pictured) was judged superior to the
Curtiss XSO3C by the
U.S. Navy in a competition for a new
scout aircraft for operation from
cruisers, the Curtiss aircraft won the contract? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: WikiCopter ( ♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I will review this over the weekend:
The first thing I noticed was that the article seems a little on the small side. Can you reticify that? That won't stop it from passing GAN, but you might have problems higher up, like at FAC. WikiCopter ( ♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
You are writing this in British English, right? Some of the words I come across are spelled ... *aha!* interestingly. WikiCopter ( ♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
![]() | Vought XSO2U has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
January 22, 2011. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that although the
Vought XSO2U (pictured) was judged superior to the
Curtiss XSO3C by the
U.S. Navy in a competition for a new
scout aircraft for operation from
cruisers, the Curtiss aircraft won the contract? |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: WikiCopter ( ♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
I will review this over the weekend:
The first thing I noticed was that the article seems a little on the small side. Can you reticify that? That won't stop it from passing GAN, but you might have problems higher up, like at FAC. WikiCopter ( ♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
You are writing this in British English, right? Some of the words I come across are spelled ... *aha!* interestingly. WikiCopter ( ♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)