This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As per Wikipedia conventions, all alternate spellings of the same term should lead to the same page. Hence, Vote bank, Vote Bank, and Votebank all need to point to the same page. The page Votebank politics in India is itself linked from Votebank, and hence it makes no sense to link to it from Vote Bank. Gamesmasterg9 10:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I have contested that opinion, and the matter is still under resolution. You should at least wait for the final decision on that issue. Gamesmasterg9 10:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I am willing to go through the proper channels. When my initial proposal (deletion of the page that is now Votebank politics in India) was rejected by a vote, I noted that a number of members had suggested a massive clean-up, which was what I attempted. I still believe that the decision to split into two was the correct one and, in fact, am waiting for the outcome of the vote on HolyWarrior's proposal to delete it. Finally, I was the one who called for a 3O here. As you can see, I'm perfectly willing to resolve the dispute by established procedure. Gamesmaster G-9 18:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
2.treating all edits made to a page which he had created as personal affronts
3.I noted that a number of members had suggested a massive clean-up, which was what I attempted.---What were your other attempts besides moving the page and tagging NPOV???????
Holy |
Warrior 07:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
I would like to state my strong objections to the proposed merger. There has already been a discussion on the issue, and the clear majority voted to Keep this article. Only one vote was received in favour of a Merge. Gamesmaster G-9 08:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
See this [2]. It states that a merger may proceed if after five days, there is consensus or silence. Since there is neither, the merger should not go ahead. If you still want it merged, add it to the proposed mergers list. Gamesmaster G-9 16:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Read this carefully - How to merge pages. Once you do, I hope you will stop tagging this page. I'm getting quite tired of this. Gamesmaster G-9 05:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Please point to specific statements that you consider controversial. Gamesmaster G-9 09:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
The merge tag is not meant to stay indefinitely. I've merged since I saw no concrete reason expressed against it. Old article's talk page is here. El_C 12:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I have already had this exact same discussion with User:Ikonoblast, after I tagged the old article Votebank politics in India with a {{ pov}} tag. He kept removing it, and I finally gave up. Read this Talk:Votebank politics in India, particularly the last part of the page. Gamesmaster G-9 01:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
http://pv.cgpi.org/pv300499.htm#1
Will come up with more refs. Hkelkar 10:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Harassment by us!! Ha! Never in my life have I seen a clearer case of the pot calling the kettle black. You need to stop behaving like the article is your personal property. Gamesmaster G-9 14:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
The definition part of article is POVish without any expert citation should be removed. Ikon | no-blast 09:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
All sources in the article are the basic foundation on which this article is built,removal should be treated as vandalism as per WP:VAND. Ikon | no-blast 12:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
“ | The left parties, CPI and CPI (M), are ideology-based political entities and have a committed ideological cadre as their constituency. West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura are the few states where these parties are strong. | ” |
Note ---- > Ideological cadres are not regarded as votebanks. Ikon | no-blast 11:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
As per Wikipedia conventions, all alternate spellings of the same term should lead to the same page. Hence, Vote bank, Vote Bank, and Votebank all need to point to the same page. The page Votebank politics in India is itself linked from Votebank, and hence it makes no sense to link to it from Vote Bank. Gamesmasterg9 10:32, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I have contested that opinion, and the matter is still under resolution. You should at least wait for the final decision on that issue. Gamesmasterg9 10:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I am willing to go through the proper channels. When my initial proposal (deletion of the page that is now Votebank politics in India) was rejected by a vote, I noted that a number of members had suggested a massive clean-up, which was what I attempted. I still believe that the decision to split into two was the correct one and, in fact, am waiting for the outcome of the vote on HolyWarrior's proposal to delete it. Finally, I was the one who called for a 3O here. As you can see, I'm perfectly willing to resolve the dispute by established procedure. Gamesmaster G-9 18:14, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
2.treating all edits made to a page which he had created as personal affronts
3.I noted that a number of members had suggested a massive clean-up, which was what I attempted.---What were your other attempts besides moving the page and tagging NPOV???????
Holy |
Warrior 07:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 24 July 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
I would like to state my strong objections to the proposed merger. There has already been a discussion on the issue, and the clear majority voted to Keep this article. Only one vote was received in favour of a Merge. Gamesmaster G-9 08:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
See this [2]. It states that a merger may proceed if after five days, there is consensus or silence. Since there is neither, the merger should not go ahead. If you still want it merged, add it to the proposed mergers list. Gamesmaster G-9 16:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Read this carefully - How to merge pages. Once you do, I hope you will stop tagging this page. I'm getting quite tired of this. Gamesmaster G-9 05:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Please point to specific statements that you consider controversial. Gamesmaster G-9 09:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
The merge tag is not meant to stay indefinitely. I've merged since I saw no concrete reason expressed against it. Old article's talk page is here. El_C 12:22, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
I have already had this exact same discussion with User:Ikonoblast, after I tagged the old article Votebank politics in India with a {{ pov}} tag. He kept removing it, and I finally gave up. Read this Talk:Votebank politics in India, particularly the last part of the page. Gamesmaster G-9 01:43, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
http://pv.cgpi.org/pv300499.htm#1
Will come up with more refs. Hkelkar 10:16, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Harassment by us!! Ha! Never in my life have I seen a clearer case of the pot calling the kettle black. You need to stop behaving like the article is your personal property. Gamesmaster G-9 14:36, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
The definition part of article is POVish without any expert citation should be removed. Ikon | no-blast 09:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
All sources in the article are the basic foundation on which this article is built,removal should be treated as vandalism as per WP:VAND. Ikon | no-blast 12:09, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
“ | The left parties, CPI and CPI (M), are ideology-based political entities and have a committed ideological cadre as their constituency. West Bengal, Kerala and Tripura are the few states where these parties are strong. | ” |
Note ---- > Ideological cadres are not regarded as votebanks. Ikon | no-blast 11:41, 29 September 2006 (UTC)