 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Break out this horse tack definition book.
The last two paragraphs of this article are very closely copied from the one source of the article, with the last paragraph being completely copy + pasted. However, it seems like that's the only source for the article. Pishcal ( talk) 18:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- The last paragraph is a quote (from the case) so I added quotation marks. RJFJR ( talk) 16:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
It is unclear why what appears to be a mundane patent case was decided by the Supreme Court. Some discussion of the history of the case and the reason it was not settled at the district court level would be helpful. Bill ( talk) 07:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Break out this horse tack definition book.
The last two paragraphs of this article are very closely copied from the one source of the article, with the last paragraph being completely copy + pasted. However, it seems like that's the only source for the article. Pishcal ( talk) 18:17, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- The last paragraph is a quote (from the case) so I added quotation marks. RJFJR ( talk) 16:56, 27 April 2015 (UTC)
It is unclear why what appears to be a mundane patent case was decided by the Supreme Court. Some discussion of the history of the case and the reason it was not settled at the district court level would be helpful. Bill ( talk) 07:33, 1 June 2020 (UTC)