This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Due to the sheer volume of changes necessary to hack this into something accurate (or something that won't shame a 1L under professorial cross), I submit this as justification to reboot this topic with a ground-up rewrite (which I am working on now) Wermsker ( talk) 05:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
I've completed the rewrite. Mixed audience targeting, I tried to follow these guiding principles:
I was less interested in appealing to the "fully informed" audience that can just as easily read the full case.
I didn't reference page numbers because many editions exist for some of the casebooks. I err'd on the side of credibly verifiable.
While I go a bit deeper than any single casebook, there are some professors that have turned this one case into a full semester launch pad. So I didn't even try to mount a full analysis with all the potential forks.
If, upon reading this rewrite, you become violently ill or emotionally unstable [[File:|18px|link=]], take the appropriate measures to remedy your discomfort. ☯ wermsker ( A T C) 03:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:WisconsinSupremeCourtSeal.gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 19:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Due to the sheer volume of changes necessary to hack this into something accurate (or something that won't shame a 1L under professorial cross), I submit this as justification to reboot this topic with a ground-up rewrite (which I am working on now) Wermsker ( talk) 05:51, 24 July 2012 (UTC)
I've completed the rewrite. Mixed audience targeting, I tried to follow these guiding principles:
I was less interested in appealing to the "fully informed" audience that can just as easily read the full case.
I didn't reference page numbers because many editions exist for some of the casebooks. I err'd on the side of credibly verifiable.
While I go a bit deeper than any single casebook, there are some professors that have turned this one case into a full semester launch pad. So I didn't even try to mount a full analysis with all the potential forks.
If, upon reading this rewrite, you become violently ill or emotionally unstable [[File:|18px|link=]], take the appropriate measures to remedy your discomfort. ☯ wermsker ( A T C) 03:27, 25 July 2012 (UTC)
An image used in this article,
File:WisconsinSupremeCourtSeal.gif, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Deletion requests June 2011
| |
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (
commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 19:37, 30 June 2011 (UTC) |