This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Agree. I'll have to see who made
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_S/V70 and I'm not the person that marked it for merging into the S70 article, but information in the "S/V70" article is redundant and the namespace is just wrong. --
Charles Gaudette 07:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Agree. There is some good stuff in the S/V70 article that can be put into the S70 article. I suggest renaming it to "S70/V70" and deleting the existing "S/V70" article. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.164.45.136 (
talk) 20:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Agree. I'll have to see who made
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volvo_S/V70 and I'm not the person that marked it for merging into the S70 article, but information in the "S/V70" article is redundant and the namespace is just wrong. --
Charles Gaudette 07:22, 22 September 2007 (UTC)reply
Agree. There is some good stuff in the S/V70 article that can be put into the S70 article. I suggest renaming it to "S70/V70" and deleting the existing "S/V70" article. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
70.164.45.136 (
talk) 20:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)reply