This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A few source links
Jdavid net ( talk) 17:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
is this american only? missing the 2.0 5 cyl versions for the 850s and whatever else. seems a very bare-bones article to say the least right now.--
Lotsofmagnets (
talk) 13:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
i think the hp/tq specs are backwards for the 1.9 engines. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.0.101.227 (
talk) 23:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
this is missing many american engines too, it appears to only cover newer versions.
Also B5234FS, maybe others from this list. [1] Some"FS" variants are listed in the article, but this letter combination, or at least the "F" part, goes unmentioned in the "decoding" paragraph. Andyvphil ( talk) 02:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I've added quite a few engines, but there are clearly a lot more that need adding, and things such as standardization of the naming need improving (ie, whether Volvo S70 or S70 is the text shown). Lukeno94 ( talk) 22:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Can we please remove repeated double entries for Mondeo Mk4 and XR5 in Australia as well as the S-Max 2.5T under B5254T6? These were 162kw (216/217bhp) B5254T3 as correctly shown in the appropriate entry and someone keeps adding them back into the wrong section. The T6 was 147kw which is 197bhp and does not tie in with what these vehicles had. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyBlazE ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
It appears there is contention as to when the VVIS system was discontinued from the naturally aspirated cars. I have provided 2 primary sources, both from Volvo cars that the system was used right up to year model 1997 although this has been called insufficient by another party who I can only assume believes that since the system was discontinued in the US in 1994 then no other country can be taken into consideration. I'm not sure if it's actually theoretically possible but can someone find a source for the continued use of the VVIS system more reliable and trustworthy than Volvo cars? Lotsofmagnets ( talk) 23:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I deleted all access-dates in references where an archive-date was available, as one doesn't need both. I tried to converse on the anonymous IP's page, and then asked at Help_talk:Citation_Style_1#Using_access-date_and_archive-date where there has so far been no support for providing both dates. An archive-date trumps an access-date and makes it entirely useless, only making the references very hard to decipher. In general, this article still suffers from severe WP:OVERCITE and WP:OVERLINK. Example: no need to link rpm more than once, if ever. No need to cite the power, the torque, and the engine speeds individually - I am sure that one source for all will suffice.
Lastly, I don't think that citing authors with their first names first is the norm, but if that's the way the article was originally laid out, then so be it. Mr.choppers | ✎ 06:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
According to current information on this page (which is based on https://web.archive.org/web/20160304065345/http://www.carfolio.com/search/results/?engcode=B5244S2) B5244S2 were available only on V70 1st gen, however according to: /info/en/?search=Volvo_V70#Engines_2 V70 2nd gen were also equipped with B5244S2. Please clarify this point
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
A few source links
Jdavid net ( talk) 17:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
is this american only? missing the 2.0 5 cyl versions for the 850s and whatever else. seems a very bare-bones article to say the least right now.--
Lotsofmagnets (
talk) 13:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
i think the hp/tq specs are backwards for the 1.9 engines. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
68.0.101.227 (
talk) 23:39, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
this is missing many american engines too, it appears to only cover newer versions.
Also B5234FS, maybe others from this list. [1] Some"FS" variants are listed in the article, but this letter combination, or at least the "F" part, goes unmentioned in the "decoding" paragraph. Andyvphil ( talk) 02:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)
I've added quite a few engines, but there are clearly a lot more that need adding, and things such as standardization of the naming need improving (ie, whether Volvo S70 or S70 is the text shown). Lukeno94 ( talk) 22:03, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Can we please remove repeated double entries for Mondeo Mk4 and XR5 in Australia as well as the S-Max 2.5T under B5254T6? These were 162kw (216/217bhp) B5254T3 as correctly shown in the appropriate entry and someone keeps adding them back into the wrong section. The T6 was 147kw which is 197bhp and does not tie in with what these vehicles had. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnnyBlazE ( talk • contribs) 15:26, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
It appears there is contention as to when the VVIS system was discontinued from the naturally aspirated cars. I have provided 2 primary sources, both from Volvo cars that the system was used right up to year model 1997 although this has been called insufficient by another party who I can only assume believes that since the system was discontinued in the US in 1994 then no other country can be taken into consideration. I'm not sure if it's actually theoretically possible but can someone find a source for the continued use of the VVIS system more reliable and trustworthy than Volvo cars? Lotsofmagnets ( talk) 23:11, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
I deleted all access-dates in references where an archive-date was available, as one doesn't need both. I tried to converse on the anonymous IP's page, and then asked at Help_talk:Citation_Style_1#Using_access-date_and_archive-date where there has so far been no support for providing both dates. An archive-date trumps an access-date and makes it entirely useless, only making the references very hard to decipher. In general, this article still suffers from severe WP:OVERCITE and WP:OVERLINK. Example: no need to link rpm more than once, if ever. No need to cite the power, the torque, and the engine speeds individually - I am sure that one source for all will suffice.
Lastly, I don't think that citing authors with their first names first is the norm, but if that's the way the article was originally laid out, then so be it. Mr.choppers | ✎ 06:08, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
According to current information on this page (which is based on https://web.archive.org/web/20160304065345/http://www.carfolio.com/search/results/?engcode=B5244S2) B5244S2 were available only on V70 1st gen, however according to: /info/en/?search=Volvo_V70#Engines_2 V70 2nd gen were also equipped with B5244S2. Please clarify this point