![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move. Terasail [Talk] 22:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Volumes, 1 & 2 (Shinedown EP) → Volume 1 and Volume 2 – The title of this article is a mess. First of all, these aren't Shinedown EPs – the cover art of the EPs and every source for them credit them to "Smith & Myers". But "Volumes, 1 & 2" isn't a great title either: there's no obvious reason for the comma in that title, and no sources use "Volumes" instead of "Volume". I think this should be titled either Volume 1 and Volume 2 as per the Classic Rock review [1], or Volume 1 and 2 as per the Kerrang! review [2]. There might also be an argument for Volumes 1 and 2 or Volumes 1 & 2, but note there is already an article for the latter option for a different album, so the disambiguator "(Smith & Myers EPs)" would have to be added for this option. I prefer my suggestion because the Volumes 1 & 2 album is a single album, whereas these are two separately released EPs, and Volume 1 and Volume 2 emphasizes that. I don't think these should be separated into two articles as the reliable sources have reviewed them together, and there don't seem to be any reliable sources at all for Volume 2 on its own. Given the various options for re-titling this article, I thought it would be best to discuss them first and gain a consensus. Richard3120 ( talk) 01:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The result of the move request was: Consensus to not move. Terasail [Talk] 22:03, 1 November 2020 (UTC)
Volumes, 1 & 2 (Shinedown EP) → Volume 1 and Volume 2 – The title of this article is a mess. First of all, these aren't Shinedown EPs – the cover art of the EPs and every source for them credit them to "Smith & Myers". But "Volumes, 1 & 2" isn't a great title either: there's no obvious reason for the comma in that title, and no sources use "Volumes" instead of "Volume". I think this should be titled either Volume 1 and Volume 2 as per the Classic Rock review [1], or Volume 1 and 2 as per the Kerrang! review [2]. There might also be an argument for Volumes 1 and 2 or Volumes 1 & 2, but note there is already an article for the latter option for a different album, so the disambiguator "(Smith & Myers EPs)" would have to be added for this option. I prefer my suggestion because the Volumes 1 & 2 album is a single album, whereas these are two separately released EPs, and Volume 1 and Volume 2 emphasizes that. I don't think these should be separated into two articles as the reliable sources have reviewed them together, and there don't seem to be any reliable sources at all for Volume 2 on its own. Given the various options for re-titling this article, I thought it would be best to discuss them first and gain a consensus. Richard3120 ( talk) 01:26, 24 October 2020 (UTC)