![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I understand that some lodges under GOdF place their book of constitutions on their altars... however I am not sure that they refer to this book as a Volume of Sacred Law (even in French). I will try to reword. Blueboar ( talk) 21:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I see that this article is currently essentially the same as what is stated in the main Freemasonry article (the only difference being the additon of the short bit on the Washington Bible). Is this yet another article on something related to Freemasonry that can not be expanded further? If if so, we should think about merging it back and redirecting the term to that section. Blueboar ( talk) 22:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, it has been almost two years since I asked the question above (is it possible to expand this article beyond what it currently says?)... and given the lack of any edits since then, I have to assume that the the answer is "no". I am therefore going to formally propose that we merge this into an appropriate section of the main Freemasonry article. Blueboar ( talk) 12:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has challenged the description of the George Washington Inaugural Bible as the "most famous" individual VSL. I think this is a "sky is blue" situation (ie a statement that is so obvious that it does not need a citation). Can anyone think of another individual VSL that would come even close in terms of fame? Blueboar ( talk) 11:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Don't you think there ought perhaps to be a short explanation as to why the term VSL is used? It is an English translation of the Hebrew Sefer ha-Torah, the book of the Law of Moses, and hence the books we call the Bible collectively. Nuttyskin ( talk) 12:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Nuttyskin ( talk) 12:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I understand that some lodges under GOdF place their book of constitutions on their altars... however I am not sure that they refer to this book as a Volume of Sacred Law (even in French). I will try to reword. Blueboar ( talk) 21:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
I see that this article is currently essentially the same as what is stated in the main Freemasonry article (the only difference being the additon of the short bit on the Washington Bible). Is this yet another article on something related to Freemasonry that can not be expanded further? If if so, we should think about merging it back and redirecting the term to that section. Blueboar ( talk) 22:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Well, it has been almost two years since I asked the question above (is it possible to expand this article beyond what it currently says?)... and given the lack of any edits since then, I have to assume that the the answer is "no". I am therefore going to formally propose that we merge this into an appropriate section of the main Freemasonry article. Blueboar ( talk) 12:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
An editor has challenged the description of the George Washington Inaugural Bible as the "most famous" individual VSL. I think this is a "sky is blue" situation (ie a statement that is so obvious that it does not need a citation). Can anyone think of another individual VSL that would come even close in terms of fame? Blueboar ( talk) 11:52, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
Don't you think there ought perhaps to be a short explanation as to why the term VSL is used? It is an English translation of the Hebrew Sefer ha-Torah, the book of the Law of Moses, and hence the books we call the Bible collectively. Nuttyskin ( talk) 12:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC) Nuttyskin ( talk) 12:19, 31 August 2017 (UTC)