From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested article

This article was written in response to the request made at the Social Sciences (Non-people) section of the Requested Articles page. Darwin Naz ( talk) 00:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Self contradiction.

Did nobody note the extreme self contradiction between these two sentences, thus one is or both are complete nonsense.Hans J. Holm, 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:C4C0:C37F:838F:CEE8 ( talk) 15:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Which sentences? –  Joe ( talk) 15:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply
The chronology. I have now deleted the completely outdated "more specific"(??) dates of Gimbutas. Who regards this as interesting, must formulate this in a new paragraphc "history of science." 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:5197:6B48:2DF0:4C59 ( talk) 15:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply
In particular, the Fat'janovo( Fatyanovo)-Balanovo c. starts already at 2900 in the same area! 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:60AC:7A4C:CD69:2460 ( talk) 07:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply
And is thus not "contemporaneous with the Volosovo" - perhaps overlapping in its earliest forms. BTW - above all criticism, we all owe a lot of thanks to authors starting such difficult articles! 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:1D14:8152:67FC:2BDE ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Direction

"Finds" without dates can never mark a direction. HJJHolm ( talk) 15:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Dubious source

In the right-hand box, "Followed by Netted Ware culture[2]" points to Mailhammer, which is incomplete. Author and page are missing. The book seems to be outdated, anyway. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:5197:6B48:2DF0:4C59 ( talk) 15:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Neolithic?

It is unclear whether "Neolithic" is meant here in the scientific sense or as in fact Pottery Mesolitic in Soviet tradition. HJJHolm ( talk) 05:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested article

This article was written in response to the request made at the Social Sciences (Non-people) section of the Requested Articles page. Darwin Naz ( talk) 00:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC) reply

Self contradiction.

Did nobody note the extreme self contradiction between these two sentences, thus one is or both are complete nonsense.Hans J. Holm, 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:C4C0:C37F:838F:CEE8 ( talk) 15:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Which sentences? –  Joe ( talk) 15:06, 13 November 2020 (UTC) reply
The chronology. I have now deleted the completely outdated "more specific"(??) dates of Gimbutas. Who regards this as interesting, must formulate this in a new paragraphc "history of science." 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:5197:6B48:2DF0:4C59 ( talk) 15:40, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply
In particular, the Fat'janovo( Fatyanovo)-Balanovo c. starts already at 2900 in the same area! 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:60AC:7A4C:CD69:2460 ( talk) 07:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC) reply
And is thus not "contemporaneous with the Volosovo" - perhaps overlapping in its earliest forms. BTW - above all criticism, we all owe a lot of thanks to authors starting such difficult articles! 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:1D14:8152:67FC:2BDE ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 15:48, 1 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Direction

"Finds" without dates can never mark a direction. HJJHolm ( talk) 15:33, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Dubious source

In the right-hand box, "Followed by Netted Ware culture[2]" points to Mailhammer, which is incomplete. Author and page are missing. The book seems to be outdated, anyway. 2A02:8108:9640:AC3:5197:6B48:2DF0:4C59 ( talk) 15:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC) reply

Neolithic?

It is unclear whether "Neolithic" is meant here in the scientific sense or as in fact Pottery Mesolitic in Soviet tradition. HJJHolm ( talk) 05:41, 23 August 2023 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook