![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 June 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Why does the page of a fan made movie exist ? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A00:A580:1007:5700:70F7:2C3B:1424:3AFF (
talk) 14:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I actually found the webpage useful. A friend told me to check the movie out but I wanted to know a little more about the production and came to wikipedia. I rely on the info on wikipedia for most of my knowledge about the world so I'm actually fine with a page about a fanmade movie. Don't delete it, what's the point in that Sapaahmod ( talk) 16:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)sapaahmod
I think the COI can be removed - there's been no COI editing since it was added in January. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 10:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
There have been short films like this one (relatively short) that have been successful on Youtube and lead to Hollywood careers for the director and, in case of Kung Fury, a feature version of the film made in Hollywood. Does anyone know whether anything of the sort has happened with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B68:2:200E:6CCB:CD87:34:7F3F ( talk) 16:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Positive reviews does not negate the criticism levelled at the film, and only confirms that reception has been "mixed". It should also be noted that people liking stuff on youtube is not a reliable source and counts for naught when we talk about reviews.
I have reverted the changes made to the reception section as they changed the entire slant of the section without offering sources to support - the only references are the ones I proved which support the "mixed" category. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 June 2017. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
Why does the page of a fan made movie exist ? — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
2A00:A580:1007:5700:70F7:2C3B:1424:3AFF (
talk) 14:34, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi, I actually found the webpage useful. A friend told me to check the movie out but I wanted to know a little more about the production and came to wikipedia. I rely on the info on wikipedia for most of my knowledge about the world so I'm actually fine with a page about a fanmade movie. Don't delete it, what's the point in that Sapaahmod ( talk) 16:03, 25 January 2018 (UTC)sapaahmod
I think the COI can be removed - there's been no COI editing since it was added in January. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 10:22, 21 March 2018 (UTC)
There have been short films like this one (relatively short) that have been successful on Youtube and lead to Hollywood careers for the director and, in case of Kung Fury, a feature version of the film made in Hollywood. Does anyone know whether anything of the sort has happened with this? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:B68:2:200E:6CCB:CD87:34:7F3F ( talk) 16:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Positive reviews does not negate the criticism levelled at the film, and only confirms that reception has been "mixed". It should also be noted that people liking stuff on youtube is not a reliable source and counts for naught when we talk about reviews.
I have reverted the changes made to the reception section as they changed the entire slant of the section without offering sources to support - the only references are the ones I proved which support the "mixed" category. Chaheel Riens ( talk) 17:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)