This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Volcano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Volcano was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Volcano was copied or moved into Volcanic hazards with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Unless if there is no way how to treat such. - S L A Y T H E - ( talk) 13:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
I suggest adding the following terminology
It doesn't have to be exactly this sentence (you can reword it as you wish).
Related:
Reason: I want to add internal Wiki-links (double square brackets) that guide users to the definitions of "monogenetic volcano" and "polygenetic volcano". These terms are clearly defined in the category pages Category:Monogenetic volcanoes and Category:Polygenetic volcanoes but Wikipedia links to category pages are discouraged. I encountered these terms but had to leave Wikipedia article space to find clear definitions. This is the problem that I want this edit to solve.
I think this terminology would fit well in the "Volcanic activity" section. But perhaps someone can suggest a better section (or different article) to mention these terms?
(I am an autoconfirmed user and so if there are no objections, I can make the edit myself. I'm only looking for input from other editors before I make this addition.). Mgkrupa Mgkrupa 17:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The heading is off topic. I have not added off topic template which was my first reaction as actually what is needed is a complete rewrite as a History of Volcanoes section with references to total misconceptions, before there was a science of volcanology. ChaseKiwi ( talk) 15:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
pls lemme edit 96.27.136.162 ( talk) 17:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. PianoDan ( talk) 17:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Active worlds in the Solar System has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 10 § Active worlds in the Solar System until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Volcano article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 180 days |
Volcano was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This
level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Volcano was copied or moved into Volcanic hazards with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
Unless if there is no way how to treat such. - S L A Y T H E - ( talk) 13:38, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
I suggest adding the following terminology
It doesn't have to be exactly this sentence (you can reword it as you wish).
Related:
Reason: I want to add internal Wiki-links (double square brackets) that guide users to the definitions of "monogenetic volcano" and "polygenetic volcano". These terms are clearly defined in the category pages Category:Monogenetic volcanoes and Category:Polygenetic volcanoes but Wikipedia links to category pages are discouraged. I encountered these terms but had to leave Wikipedia article space to find clear definitions. This is the problem that I want this edit to solve.
I think this terminology would fit well in the "Volcanic activity" section. But perhaps someone can suggest a better section (or different article) to mention these terms?
(I am an autoconfirmed user and so if there are no objections, I can make the edit myself. I'm only looking for input from other editors before I make this addition.). Mgkrupa Mgkrupa 17:40, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
The heading is off topic. I have not added off topic template which was my first reaction as actually what is needed is a complete rewrite as a History of Volcanoes section with references to total misconceptions, before there was a science of volcanology. ChaseKiwi ( talk) 15:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
References
This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
pls lemme edit 96.27.136.162 ( talk) 17:24, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Not done: this is not the right page to request additional user rights. You may reopen this request with the specific changes to be made and someone may add them for you, or if you have an account, you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. PianoDan ( talk) 17:39, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
The redirect Active worlds in the Solar System has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 10 § Active worlds in the Solar System until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 17:07, 10 July 2024 (UTC)