This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 25, 2014. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() | This article was a past Slipknot Article of Focus! You can view the current article of focus, or view other past articles of focus. |
You should include Alternative metal and heavy metal. Since all their singles from this album are any of those genres, why is the album just labeled as nu metal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.222.205 ( talk) 02:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Please leave me a note when done. Cheers, giggy ( :O) 10:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.
Cheers, giggy ( :O) 01:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Ref 17 has been vandalized. Ironxwalrus ( talk) 04:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I think is notable that the "The Nameless" single is not from Vol.3. While it originally appeared on this album, the single is actually from 9.0: Live.
Do I have permission to change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xanthic-Ztk ( talk • contribs) 02:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
In an attempt to end continuous edit warring the following list has been organized, please add any sources to the list so a consensus can be reached on what to add to the infobox. Keep in mind that personal opinions have no place on Wikipedia articles, and all information should be from a reliable source and WP:NPOV. Thank you. Black ngold29 01:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
heyy err i really like the page and it was very informational, but correct me if im wrong but aren't slipknot classed as a Nu-metal band ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitaralica ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Recently Metal Hammer called Vol.3 one of the "Albums Of The Decade". I feel this is worth adding to the article. I just need a consensus on this. What do you say?
Albums Of The Decade-Vol.3:(The Subliminal Verses)
Torque3000 ( talk) 08:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add a genre to this article unless you have a source per WP:RS, WP:OR, and WP:SUBJECTIVE. Thank you. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 03:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Lukejordan02 ( talk) 10:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
http://www.chroniclesofchaos.com/articles.aspx?id=2-3492 http://www.metalstorm.net/pub/review.php?review_id=1690&page=&message_id= http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/8386/Slipknot-Vol.-3%3A-(The-Subliminal-Verses) Lukejordan02 ( talk) 11:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
http://alreadyheard.com/post/52788999687/versus-slipknot-vol-3-the-subliminal-verses-vs#.U_XUvmK9KK0
This site refers to the album as an Alternative Metal masterpiece and the site is not on the unreliable source section on wiki. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 11:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
So with all that, we've found that it's not a nu-metal album at least. Please actually post content from your review so I don't have to go digging through it myself to figure out what you are trying to say. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 12:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
@ Andrzejbanas::I have spent a while trying to find reliable sources on online and in print but can't find any, what do you think about changing this genre and the All Hope Is Gone genre to just Heavy Metal? Lukejordan02 ( talk) 18:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
By the way, archived version of The Boston Globe review may be helpful; it classifies the album as nu metal. Myxomatosis57 ( talk) 21:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Singles traditionally have pages for themselves but The Blister Exists doesn't. When also saying that it was the single that preceded All Gone Is Gone, User:FlightTime seemed like they wanted to start a war of words when seeing it and aggressively told me that it was violating the policy (IT WAS NOT) and deleted it. But for The Nameless which precedes The Blister Exists, it states that The Blister Exists was the next single that was released in 2007, even though on this album, it says it was released in 2006.
The chronology of the singles within this album is also mixed since it goes Duality, Vermillion, Before I Forget and then back to Duality and FlightTime wasn't dumb enough to realise this before it was reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
When also editing The Nameless a while back, I said it (The Nameless) was also from this album, despite it first being released as a single on the live album 9.0: Live, since the song was practically released first released on this album before it became a single. But once again it was deleted by FlightTime because it was an " unreliable source". Again, I said The Blister Exists was released in 2006, but was also reverted; but the thing that confuses me is why did FlightTime delete The Blister Exists being a single on All Hope Is Gone but not The Nameless?
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses) is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on May 25, 2014. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() | This article was a past Slipknot Article of Focus! You can view the current article of focus, or view other past articles of focus. |
You should include Alternative metal and heavy metal. Since all their singles from this album are any of those genres, why is the album just labeled as nu metal? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.238.222.205 ( talk) 02:19, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
This review is transcluded from Talk:Vol. 3: (The Subliminal Verses)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Please leave me a note when done. Cheers, giggy ( :O) 10:34, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
This GAN has passed, and this is now a good article! If you found this review helpful, please consider helping out a fellow editor by reviewing another good article nomination. Help and advice on how to do so is available at Wikipedia:Reviewing good articles, and you can ask for the help of a GAN mentor, if you wish.
Cheers, giggy ( :O) 01:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Ref 17 has been vandalized. Ironxwalrus ( talk) 04:30, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
I think is notable that the "The Nameless" single is not from Vol.3. While it originally appeared on this album, the single is actually from 9.0: Live.
Do I have permission to change it? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xanthic-Ztk ( talk • contribs) 02:41, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
In an attempt to end continuous edit warring the following list has been organized, please add any sources to the list so a consensus can be reached on what to add to the infobox. Keep in mind that personal opinions have no place on Wikipedia articles, and all information should be from a reliable source and WP:NPOV. Thank you. Black ngold29 01:43, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
heyy err i really like the page and it was very informational, but correct me if im wrong but aren't slipknot classed as a Nu-metal band ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Guitaralica ( talk • contribs) 00:26, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
Recently Metal Hammer called Vol.3 one of the "Albums Of The Decade". I feel this is worth adding to the article. I just need a consensus on this. What do you say?
Albums Of The Decade-Vol.3:(The Subliminal Verses)
Torque3000 ( talk) 08:04, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add a genre to this article unless you have a source per WP:RS, WP:OR, and WP:SUBJECTIVE. Thank you. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 03:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Lukejordan02 ( talk) 10:51, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
http://www.chroniclesofchaos.com/articles.aspx?id=2-3492 http://www.metalstorm.net/pub/review.php?review_id=1690&page=&message_id= http://www.sputnikmusic.com/review/8386/Slipknot-Vol.-3%3A-(The-Subliminal-Verses) Lukejordan02 ( talk) 11:02, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
http://alreadyheard.com/post/52788999687/versus-slipknot-vol-3-the-subliminal-verses-vs#.U_XUvmK9KK0
This site refers to the album as an Alternative Metal masterpiece and the site is not on the unreliable source section on wiki. Lukejordan02 ( talk) 11:16, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
So with all that, we've found that it's not a nu-metal album at least. Please actually post content from your review so I don't have to go digging through it myself to figure out what you are trying to say. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 12:08, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
@ Andrzejbanas::I have spent a while trying to find reliable sources on online and in print but can't find any, what do you think about changing this genre and the All Hope Is Gone genre to just Heavy Metal? Lukejordan02 ( talk) 18:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
By the way, archived version of The Boston Globe review may be helpful; it classifies the album as nu metal. Myxomatosis57 ( talk) 21:51, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
Singles traditionally have pages for themselves but The Blister Exists doesn't. When also saying that it was the single that preceded All Gone Is Gone, User:FlightTime seemed like they wanted to start a war of words when seeing it and aggressively told me that it was violating the policy (IT WAS NOT) and deleted it. But for The Nameless which precedes The Blister Exists, it states that The Blister Exists was the next single that was released in 2007, even though on this album, it says it was released in 2006.
The chronology of the singles within this album is also mixed since it goes Duality, Vermillion, Before I Forget and then back to Duality and FlightTime wasn't dumb enough to realise this before it was reverted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikey'Da'Man, Archangel ( talk • contribs) 19:41, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
When also editing The Nameless a while back, I said it (The Nameless) was also from this album, despite it first being released as a single on the live album 9.0: Live, since the song was practically released first released on this album before it became a single. But once again it was deleted by FlightTime because it was an " unreliable source". Again, I said The Blister Exists was released in 2006, but was also reverted; but the thing that confuses me is why did FlightTime delete The Blister Exists being a single on All Hope Is Gone but not The Nameless?