Voivode of Transylvania ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 3 February 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

	Voivode of Transylvania has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 3, 2013 Peer review Reviewed February 6, 2013 Good article nominee Listed July 5, 2013 Featured article candidate Not promoted
Current status: Good article

Voivode of Transylvania received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Hungary High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Military history: Medieval / Early Modern This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Associated task forces: /  Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500) Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800) Romania Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania- related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. To-do list: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Help Romania reach at least GA-status Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD Request an article or create a missing one Assess : Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality Cleanup : Review the Romania-related cleanup listing Normalize the use of " Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and " Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia Disambiguation : Disambiguate project articles and get points Expand : Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania Translate : Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian) Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara. Other : Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 ( WLM Romania external site) Review newly created Romania-related articles Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items Create Awards for WikiProject Romania Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Archives

1

I have been desperately trying to understand the aim of the recent edits by Raysdiet. I can accept that the Romanian name of the rivers should be added, but I do not see what is the reason of changing other names. Borsoka ( talk) 16:11, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply

You should accept them, because they can be placed there as it is. Hortobagy ( talk) 18:34, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Why do you think that the deletion of alternative names is in line with WP policies? Borsoka ( talk) 19:29, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Because WP policies says NPOV and now is POV. Hope you understand this now, thank you for your understanding. Hortobagy ( talk) 19:40, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Sorry, I am surprised by the above answer. Why do you think that addign multiple names contradicts to the requirement of neutrality? Borsoka ( talk) 19:53, 19 May 2013 (UTC) reply

Dear Hortobagy, my above answer still remained unanswered. Why do you think that deleting alternative names from this article contribute to its improvement?

@ Royal Free Citiy: please remember you cannot edit WP. Borsoka ( talk) 02:28, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Why? Who are you? The owner of this site? Is stubes your sockpuppet? Why do you try to debate basic statistics of elementary school level? -- Royal Free Citiy ( talk) 05:43, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply

Again: you cannot edit WP. Borsoka ( talk) 11:32, 21 September 2020 (UTC) reply