This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, are there any sources in English establishing "Voice" as the common use title? The Slovak Spectator uses "Hlas" [1], and that seems definitely more recognisable to me. Jdcooper ( talk) 15:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Jdcooper In this edit, you have removed the tag Populism from the infobox, reasoning that 'unsourced and "populism" is very poorly defined at the best of times)'.
However, as of now, the introductory section contains the following sentence:
"Voice â Social Democracy has been described as a catch-all party [1] [2] of a populist nature, [3] often reluctant to take positions opposed by a significant segment of the electorate. [4]"
This sentence, sourced by four citations, sort of sources and justifies the "Populism" classification of the party, does not it?
If you or anybody else still insist on not listing Populism in the infobox, please do specify another reason than "unsourced" because the claim has been, in my view, properly cited.
References
Alpyn ( talk) 17:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I think the best color for Hlas-SD is a gradient between blue and red from the logo (~ Â #8A1039). The red color will cause confusion between Hlas-SD (Â ) and Smer-SSD (Â ), the Republic (Â ) and the Good Choice (Â ), who also use it. I would like to reach a consensus on the color of the party PLATEL ( talk) 07:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
This is strangely written. We go from Pellegrini calling for a party convention with the implication that he was about to become the leader of Smer-SD, to that he formed his own party, with no explanation of what happened in between to cause this change. And this is important, because we a read needs to know WHY he started the party. And to answer that, you have to add what happened with that call for a party convention (did it happen or didn't it). Criticalthinker ( talk) 05:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hi, are there any sources in English establishing "Voice" as the common use title? The Slovak Spectator uses "Hlas" [1], and that seems definitely more recognisable to me. Jdcooper ( talk) 15:00, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
@ Jdcooper In this edit, you have removed the tag Populism from the infobox, reasoning that 'unsourced and "populism" is very poorly defined at the best of times)'.
However, as of now, the introductory section contains the following sentence:
"Voice â Social Democracy has been described as a catch-all party [1] [2] of a populist nature, [3] often reluctant to take positions opposed by a significant segment of the electorate. [4]"
This sentence, sourced by four citations, sort of sources and justifies the "Populism" classification of the party, does not it?
If you or anybody else still insist on not listing Populism in the infobox, please do specify another reason than "unsourced" because the claim has been, in my view, properly cited.
References
Alpyn ( talk) 17:16, 2 November 2022 (UTC)
I think the best color for Hlas-SD is a gradient between blue and red from the logo (~ Â #8A1039). The red color will cause confusion between Hlas-SD (Â ) and Smer-SSD (Â ), the Republic (Â ) and the Good Choice (Â ), who also use it. I would like to reach a consensus on the color of the party PLATEL ( talk) 07:35, 8 March 2023 (UTC)
This is strangely written. We go from Pellegrini calling for a party convention with the implication that he was about to become the leader of Smer-SD, to that he formed his own party, with no explanation of what happened in between to cause this change. And this is important, because we a read needs to know WHY he started the party. And to answer that, you have to add what happened with that call for a party convention (did it happen or didn't it). Criticalthinker ( talk) 05:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)