From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen ( talk · contribs) 22:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

I shall review this article. T A P 22:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Feel free to strike the below when done or commenting on it.

Lead
  • Entire
  • Please remove references 4 and 5 from the lead as they are used in the article. Per 1b.
  • With references 6 and 7, they are only in the lead. The information should be mentioned in the article, if possible.
  • " Modernist" ⇒ " modernist"?
  • " Postmodernism" ⇒ " postmodernism". Also, could link to postmodernism.

I think its common to see capital letters for this. Request a third party to comment on it.

Early Life
  • Paragraph 1
  • Short, but grand.
  • Paragraph 2
  • "of Allied-occupied" ⇒ "of allied-occupied".
  • Paragraph 3

That's not essential but I will do so.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Career
  • Paragraph 1
  • Rosslyn
  • Grand.
  • Other works in the 1960s
  • "that was the first skyscraper in the city" — unlink skyscraper, linked in lead.
Its customary to link in lead and then once in the body.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply
  • "The first major office building to be constructed on the Georgetown waterfront in 50 years,[34] it formerly housed the Henry J. Kaufman advertising firm" — new sentence in middle?
No, the citation is in the middle of sentence after the comma.
  • Works from the 1970s
  • "By the end of 1975, the New York Times was reporting that Koubek's firm had designed roughly half the office buildings built in the District of Columbia since the 1950s" — link NYT article fully; The New York Times.
if you look at the pipe link it already does this.
  • The Willard renovation
  • Critic Paul Goldberger, writing for New York Times declared the renovation ingenious" — {{ when}}?
1986. Added
  • Other 1970s projects
  • Grand.
  • Works of the 1980s
  • "He also designed Shockoe Plaza (now known as Shockoe Slip), a seven-building ..." ⇒ "He also designed Shockoe Slip (formerly Shockoe Plaza), a seven-building ..."
Changed.
  • Final works
  • Fine.
Other activities
Changed.
Later years and death
  • Grand.
Design philosophy
  • Fine.
Legacy
  • Bit of a list, could be rewritten.
Well, it is a list of notable works really so I think its appropriate.

I shall put this on hold until the issues above have been addressed. Thanks! T A P 18:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Thanks! T A P 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thine Antique Pen ( talk · contribs) 22:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

I shall review this article. T A P 22:24, 22 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Feel free to strike the below when done or commenting on it.

Lead
  • Entire
  • Please remove references 4 and 5 from the lead as they are used in the article. Per 1b.
  • With references 6 and 7, they are only in the lead. The information should be mentioned in the article, if possible.
  • " Modernist" ⇒ " modernist"?
  • " Postmodernism" ⇒ " postmodernism". Also, could link to postmodernism.

I think its common to see capital letters for this. Request a third party to comment on it.

Early Life
  • Paragraph 1
  • Short, but grand.
  • Paragraph 2
  • "of Allied-occupied" ⇒ "of allied-occupied".
  • Paragraph 3

That's not essential but I will do so.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC) reply

Career
  • Paragraph 1
  • Rosslyn
  • Grand.
  • Other works in the 1960s
  • "that was the first skyscraper in the city" — unlink skyscraper, linked in lead.
Its customary to link in lead and then once in the body.♦ Dr. Blofeld 08:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply
  • "The first major office building to be constructed on the Georgetown waterfront in 50 years,[34] it formerly housed the Henry J. Kaufman advertising firm" — new sentence in middle?
No, the citation is in the middle of sentence after the comma.
  • Works from the 1970s
  • "By the end of 1975, the New York Times was reporting that Koubek's firm had designed roughly half the office buildings built in the District of Columbia since the 1950s" — link NYT article fully; The New York Times.
if you look at the pipe link it already does this.
  • The Willard renovation
  • Critic Paul Goldberger, writing for New York Times declared the renovation ingenious" — {{ when}}?
1986. Added
  • Other 1970s projects
  • Grand.
  • Works of the 1980s
  • "He also designed Shockoe Plaza (now known as Shockoe Slip), a seven-building ..." ⇒ "He also designed Shockoe Slip (formerly Shockoe Plaza), a seven-building ..."
Changed.
  • Final works
  • Fine.
Other activities
Changed.
Later years and death
  • Grand.
Design philosophy
  • Fine.
Legacy
  • Bit of a list, could be rewritten.
Well, it is a list of notable works really so I think its appropriate.

I shall put this on hold until the issues above have been addressed. Thanks! T A P 18:28, 25 June 2012 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:


Thanks! T A P 15:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook