![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Is reference 5 a reliable source - it seems to be a blog not supported by a university or other relevant authority and is used as a reference to a large section of facts? Also there seems to be a need for citations for a lot of the comments in the list of viziers section. Mjconlin00 ( talk) 21:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mjconlin00. Peer reviewers:
Mjconlin00.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
not bad... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.3.4.205 ( talk) 04:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Really good page! But I'm not sure was Nefermaat the Younger son of Nefermaat the Elder. -- Mychele Trempetich ( talk) 07:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
no, the older was the younger's uncle. – Alensha talk 23:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
😐 - Danielle Talk 9:62, 7 June 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.98.151 ( talk)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Vizier (Ancient Egypt). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Near the beginning of the article it is stated "In the New Kingdom, there were two viziers, one for Upper Egypt and one for Lower Egypt." Yet in the table of viziers of the New Kingdom ( Vizier_(Ancient_Egypt)#New_Kingdom)), it appears that in most cases only the Vizier of the South is identified. Why?
There are a few cases in the table where the comments possibly suggest that the Vizier of the South was also the Vizier of the North. Am I reading the table correctly in this case? Greg Dahlen ( talk) 13:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||
|
Is reference 5 a reliable source - it seems to be a blog not supported by a university or other relevant authority and is used as a reference to a large section of facts? Also there seems to be a need for citations for a lot of the comments in the list of viziers section. Mjconlin00 ( talk) 21:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available
on the course page. Student editor(s):
Mjconlin00. Peer reviewers:
Mjconlin00.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT ( talk) 12:31, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
not bad... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 210.3.4.205 ( talk) 04:05, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Really good page! But I'm not sure was Nefermaat the Younger son of Nefermaat the Elder. -- Mychele Trempetich ( talk) 07:42, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
no, the older was the younger's uncle. – Alensha talk 23:45, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
😐 - Danielle Talk 9:62, 7 June 2010 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.172.98.151 ( talk)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Vizier (Ancient Egypt). Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:54, 20 January 2016 (UTC)
Near the beginning of the article it is stated "In the New Kingdom, there were two viziers, one for Upper Egypt and one for Lower Egypt." Yet in the table of viziers of the New Kingdom ( Vizier_(Ancient_Egypt)#New_Kingdom)), it appears that in most cases only the Vizier of the South is identified. Why?
There are a few cases in the table where the comments possibly suggest that the Vizier of the South was also the Vizier of the North. Am I reading the table correctly in this case? Greg Dahlen ( talk) 13:12, 31 July 2018 (UTC)