This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Vivek Ramaswamy 2024 presidential campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 180 days

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics: American Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Low-importance). United States: Presidential elections Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Low-importance).

Why doesn't this page have anything about his religion, which has been reported by many WP:RS? Nbauman ( talk) 18:43, 29 November 2023 (UTC) reply

If you have reliable sources discussing the role of Ramaswamy's religion in his presidential campaign, you can post them here. His religion is described in the Ramaswamy article in the sections Personal life and Early life and education. -- M.boli ( talk) 19:37, 29 November 2023 (UTC) reply

His religion is covered in his personal article, this article is more focused on his presidential 2024 campaign. For any mention of his religion, it would have to be in association somehow in reliable sources with his campaign. MaximusEditor ( talk) 16:40, 14 May 2024 (UTC) reply

For example, instead of "he opposes abortion" it would say "he opposed abortion." NesserWiki ( talk) 04:47, 16 January 2024 (UTC) reply

I suppose it matters on the use case. If we are talking about positions held in relativity to his campaign, I suppose past tense would be used. But if it is just a position held indefinitely, he probably still holds those positions in present tense. MaximusEditor ( talk) 21:54, 21 May 2024 (UTC) reply

When referencing Ramaswamy's arguments on the president's authority to disband federal agencies, the added clause "Legal scholars say this is not true." should be removed. For one, it is not the job of wiki to refute the things that Ramaswamy has said. Only to record them. For two, it's completely arbitrary. You can find legal scholars who will argue that what Ramaswamy said is correct as well. Ultimately, neither's opinion matters, because the ones who determine whether or not the president has that power are the judges on the supreme court. Added "context" like this just shows how embarrassingly biased the writers of this article are. 152.7.255.239 ( talk) 18:40, 11 March 2024 (UTC) reply