This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy: Language Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Associated task forces: /  Philosophy of language Linguistics This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The section on visual semiotics of agriculture is too specific for this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.116.100 ( talk) 18:48, 30 May 2013‎

There seems to be a long ADVERTISEMENT for some expo in beijing china at the end of this entry!!!!! 69.115.209.80 ( talk) 18:25, 31 October 2013 (UTC) reply

• Yeah, regarding some kind of "High-end Bottled Drinking Water Expo" in 2014. What the hell is going on here? I'm gonna strike it.

The last sentence of one paragraph reads "That's are the main point." This makes no sense to me and I suspect to most other readers. Could the author please adjust it to whatever they meant.

BallanHealey ( talk) 22:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC) BallanHealey, Australia BallanHealey ( talk) 22:28, 26 July 2021 (UTC) reply