This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please feel free to discuss potential contributions to, as well as current content of, the VIIP article here.
Some guidelines:
Jssteil ( talk) 02:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Reading the article, it uses VIIP and CBF. But no where in the articles are links or explains what these acronyms mean. Marasama ( talk) 19:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
The present article's title, viz. "visual impairment due to intracranial pressure" (emphasis added) implies a link that is hypothesised but not proven by the existing literature. yoyo ( talk) 01:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
The article title does not seem to match the scope of the lede. The lede seems to indicate a scope that is limited to spaceflight, and spaceflight studies. But the article title does not agree with this. Which is it? Cheers. N2e ( talk) 05:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
This formula needs clarification. The variables F and C both appear to refer to flow rates. Dividing one by the other gives a dimensionless quantity, where the formula requires a pressure. Furthermore a ratio other than one appears to imply a continuous change in the volume of fluid which the context suggests is the volume of fluid within the eye.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Please feel free to discuss potential contributions to, as well as current content of, the VIIP article here.
Some guidelines:
Jssteil ( talk) 02:22, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
Reading the article, it uses VIIP and CBF. But no where in the articles are links or explains what these acronyms mean. Marasama ( talk) 19:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
The present article's title, viz. "visual impairment due to intracranial pressure" (emphasis added) implies a link that is hypothesised but not proven by the existing literature. yoyo ( talk) 01:02, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
The article title does not seem to match the scope of the lede. The lede seems to indicate a scope that is limited to spaceflight, and spaceflight studies. But the article title does not agree with this. Which is it? Cheers. N2e ( talk) 05:11, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
This formula needs clarification. The variables F and C both appear to refer to flow rates. Dividing one by the other gives a dimensionless quantity, where the formula requires a pressure. Furthermore a ratio other than one appears to imply a continuous change in the volume of fluid which the context suggests is the volume of fluid within the eye.