Vistara was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of Head office, Intellion Edge, Tower A, South Peripheral Road, Sector – 72, Gurugram, Haryana - 122101 be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Vistara already operating 7 daily departures from Mumbai to Delhi (5 dep) and Ahmedabad (2 dep), recently announced flight to Bangalore as well, effective from 16 June 2015. As per the Focus city definitions, Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai likely to attain focus city status in Vistara's network. - M.soumen ( talk) 08:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: RegistryKey ( talk · contribs) 06:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Typos and grammatical errors. | Fail |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
Fail | See discussion below. |
A well-written article, however the history and fleet sections need to be further refined to fix grammar, typos, sentence fragments, and particularly in the history section, the opening statement could use a bit more context to explain how Vistara came about from an airline merger before.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Vistara. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 10:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Will review.
Sainsf <^>
Talk all words 10:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Needs much copyediting as follows:
M.soumen, I saw just now that you have already made most of the changes I recommended. Good. So, here I list the few remaining issues to make work easier: Sainsf <^> Talk all words 16:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
M.soumen, can you find some time for this? Sainsf <^> Talk all words 10:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
@ M.soumen: Please try to respond within five days. If response is delayed by more than five days, I shall be forced to fail this article. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 12:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Sainsf: Have made the changes you have suggested and cleaned the references. Think, now its good to go! Magentic Manifestations ( talk) 05:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
No article lists these, its looking like a fan wanting o show off with interlnes over code shares which Vistarar only has four, so remove non code shares. Mustangmanxxx ( talk) 15:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2016 listing which fails criterion 4 (neutrality). Article is overly promotional, especially in the services section, but also elsewhere. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 00:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Vistara on their website show the different seating arrangements of their A320neo and 787-9 aircraft while having no separate layout for the A321LR. Doesn’t that confirm the A321neo having the same seating layout as the A321LR? After all the difference between the two aircraft is just 3 auxiliary fuel tanks and exactly the same when it comes to the interior. Thank You. AlphaBravo178 ( talk) 14:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Vistara has received its 5th aircraft on 1 September 2023. The detailed fleet information of the airline can be found here - https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Vistara, I do not see why the edits related to this fleet information addition amounts to unconstructive edits. @ Jetstreamer has made multiple reverts to it, hence the topic shall be discussed here.
Also @
LeoFrank to call this an edit made without original research, that may amount to a review that the user made without them doing the research here - Anyways for the reference the links for "research" may be viewed here - 1)
https://www.flightera.net/en/airline/Vistara
2) https://twitter.com/airvistara/status/1697876453780840915 3) https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/boeing-787-9-dreamliner-vt-tso-vistara/epw5ko Thewikizoomer ( talk) 08:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Vistara was one of the Engineering and technology good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph of Head office, Intellion Edge, Tower A, South Peripheral Road, Sector – 72, Gurugram, Haryana - 122101 be
included in this article to
improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Vistara already operating 7 daily departures from Mumbai to Delhi (5 dep) and Ahmedabad (2 dep), recently announced flight to Bangalore as well, effective from 16 June 2015. As per the Focus city definitions, Chhatrapati Shivaji International Airport, Mumbai likely to attain focus city status in Vistara's network. - M.soumen ( talk) 08:05, 27 April 2015 (UTC).
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: RegistryKey ( talk · contribs) 06:55, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
A good article is—
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (prose) | Typos and grammatical errors. | Fail |
(b) (MoS) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Criteria | Notes | Result |
---|---|---|
(a) (major aspects) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
(b) (focused) | The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Notes | Result |
---|---|
The reviewer has no notes here. | Pass |
Result | Notes |
---|---|
Fail | See discussion below. |
A well-written article, however the history and fleet sections need to be further refined to fix grammar, typos, sentence fragments, and particularly in the history section, the opening statement could use a bit more context to explain how Vistara came about from an airline merger before.
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Vistara. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 10:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Will review.
Sainsf <^>
Talk all words 10:09, 6 March 2016 (UTC)
Needs much copyediting as follows:
M.soumen, I saw just now that you have already made most of the changes I recommended. Good. So, here I list the few remaining issues to make work easier: Sainsf <^> Talk all words 16:21, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
M.soumen, can you find some time for this? Sainsf <^> Talk all words 10:43, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
@ M.soumen: Please try to respond within five days. If response is delayed by more than five days, I shall be forced to fail this article. Sainsf <^> Feel at home 12:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
@ Sainsf: Have made the changes you have suggested and cleaned the references. Think, now its good to go! Magentic Manifestations ( talk) 05:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
No article lists these, its looking like a fan wanting o show off with interlnes over code shares which Vistarar only has four, so remove non code shares. Mustangmanxxx ( talk) 15:15, 7 September 2017 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
2016 listing which fails criterion 4 (neutrality). Article is overly promotional, especially in the services section, but also elsewhere. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 ( talk) 00:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)
Vistara on their website show the different seating arrangements of their A320neo and 787-9 aircraft while having no separate layout for the A321LR. Doesn’t that confirm the A321neo having the same seating layout as the A321LR? After all the difference between the two aircraft is just 3 auxiliary fuel tanks and exactly the same when it comes to the interior. Thank You. AlphaBravo178 ( talk) 14:38, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Vistara has received its 5th aircraft on 1 September 2023. The detailed fleet information of the airline can be found here - https://www.planespotters.net/airline/Vistara, I do not see why the edits related to this fleet information addition amounts to unconstructive edits. @ Jetstreamer has made multiple reverts to it, hence the topic shall be discussed here.
Also @
LeoFrank to call this an edit made without original research, that may amount to a review that the user made without them doing the research here - Anyways for the reference the links for "research" may be viewed here - 1)
https://www.flightera.net/en/airline/Vistara
2) https://twitter.com/airvistara/status/1697876453780840915 3) https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/boeing-787-9-dreamliner-vt-tso-vistara/epw5ko Thewikizoomer ( talk) 08:16, 3 September 2023 (UTC)