Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Blackjacks101 ( talk) 13:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Since I see that there was a miscommunication, I'll gladly step in to review it.-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 13:49, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Thank you :). Yes I don't know what happened. I could have sworn it was under review las t week :S-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 19:36, 13 March 2011 (UTC) reply

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): ( MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): (citations to reliable sources): ( OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Wow great article to easily read through! It was terrific! Just one problem, the image of Carey performing Someday is being nominated for deletion, you may want to remove it. (Which sucks since it fits in perfectly). Yet other than that everything looks good!-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 13:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply

Everything has been fixed =D..passing-- Blackjacks101 ( talk) 15:11, 14 March 2011 (UTC) reply