This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've assessed this to C-class. The tone and the lead can be improved. For example. the lead section should summarise the rest of the article, not mention anything new and usually doesn't require citations. The tone and irrelevant non-encylopaedic details have to be addressed too. "He was a very shy child until class" etc and subjective statements like ", but his popularity among fans has proven to be phenomena..." should be avoided, see Peacock terms. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 12:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed and support the removal of some rather controversial content with not supported by citations. See our WP:BLP policy. All BLP articles should be well-sourced, especially controversial information. We do not use gossip sites and websites like "Tellychakkar", "www.bollywoodlife.com.", "TellyTadka." etc sound like unreliable gossip sites to me. Stick the using regular news media please. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 04:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Quite frankly if that tag has to be addressed, a lot of content here which was recently added has to be trimmed. The "In the media" section is unneeded since having an article here implies notability. Excessive quotations from sources aren't needed. Also, removing the unreliable sources and the content which they support should be a first step. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 04:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Political दीनानाथ परमार ( talk) 08:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
दीनानाथ परमार दीनानाथ परमार ( talk) 08:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've assessed this to C-class. The tone and the lead can be improved. For example. the lead section should summarise the rest of the article, not mention anything new and usually doesn't require citations. The tone and irrelevant non-encylopaedic details have to be addressed too. "He was a very shy child until class" etc and subjective statements like ", but his popularity among fans has proven to be phenomena..." should be avoided, see Peacock terms. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 12:33, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
I've noticed and support the removal of some rather controversial content with not supported by citations. See our WP:BLP policy. All BLP articles should be well-sourced, especially controversial information. We do not use gossip sites and websites like "Tellychakkar", "www.bollywoodlife.com.", "TellyTadka." etc sound like unreliable gossip sites to me. Stick the using regular news media please. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 04:20, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Quite frankly if that tag has to be addressed, a lot of content here which was recently added has to be trimmed. The "In the media" section is unneeded since having an article here implies notability. Excessive quotations from sources aren't needed. Also, removing the unreliable sources and the content which they support should be a first step. Ugog Nizdast ( talk) 04:26, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 18:23, 28 July 2020 (UTC)
Political दीनानाथ परमार ( talk) 08:41, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
दीनानाथ परमार दीनानाथ परमार ( talk) 08:42, 5 June 2022 (UTC)