This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Virtual colonoscopy.
|
Which are the common and typical complications (perforation, infection, bleeding, radiation induced carcinomas?) and what are the incidation rates? -- 85.127.193.170 ( talk) 18:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Can anyone find wide support for today's anonymous edit that changed "2 mm" to "10 mm"? It's not my field, so I don't want to weigh in, but this contradicts everything I've read. - Dan Dank55 ( talk)( mistakes) 19:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Let's mention the most important advantage of a VC -- potentially avoiding the risks of an optical colonoscopy.- 71.174.175.150 ( talk) 20:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Virtual colonoscopy.
|
Which are the common and typical complications (perforation, infection, bleeding, radiation induced carcinomas?) and what are the incidation rates? -- 85.127.193.170 ( talk) 18:30, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Can anyone find wide support for today's anonymous edit that changed "2 mm" to "10 mm"? It's not my field, so I don't want to weigh in, but this contradicts everything I've read. - Dan Dank55 ( talk)( mistakes) 19:12, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Let's mention the most important advantage of a VC -- potentially avoiding the risks of an optical colonoscopy.- 71.174.175.150 ( talk) 20:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC)