![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2020. The result of the discussion was soft delete. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This entry refutes all the accusations of this software being sexist, which I think the majority would agree that it is. This is NOT NPOV. Written by someone in the company perhaps?
It seems like this page is specific to one product. Shouldn't this be more of a discussion of virtual people in general?
Quite frankly, I'm surprised someone hasn't created a true "virtual person" yet, aka Simone. The tech is there... maybe no one thinks it will sell? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.228.183 ( talk) 02:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if this is a safe program. While runnung it I've had problems. Does anyone know if it's because of bugs in the program or if the creators are "computerterrorists". (It seems the programmers know ALOT about vista as the program bypasses som "things"(I'm only in my seccond year och computerstudies in collage) Making it difficult to shutdown like a norman program n such stuff —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Aru05001 (
talk •
contribs)
01:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
The image used says that it is copyrighted in the label. Wouldn't that make it ineligible for use here? Sperril ( talk) 21:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
This article is of questionable notability for one, and is written in a completely ridiculous manner for two. Not only does it read like an advertisement, but it's been placed in the "cognitive architectures" category in the article List of artificial intelligence projects. It's obvious to anyone that someone involved with the creation and/or marketing of this software has been active on Wikipedia. I propose deletion or heavy modification.
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 March 2020. The result of the discussion was soft delete. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This entry refutes all the accusations of this software being sexist, which I think the majority would agree that it is. This is NOT NPOV. Written by someone in the company perhaps?
It seems like this page is specific to one product. Shouldn't this be more of a discussion of virtual people in general?
Quite frankly, I'm surprised someone hasn't created a true "virtual person" yet, aka Simone. The tech is there... maybe no one thinks it will sell? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.101.228.183 ( talk) 02:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
I was wondering if this is a safe program. While runnung it I've had problems. Does anyone know if it's because of bugs in the program or if the creators are "computerterrorists". (It seems the programmers know ALOT about vista as the program bypasses som "things"(I'm only in my seccond year och computerstudies in collage) Making it difficult to shutdown like a norman program n such stuff —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Aru05001 (
talk •
contribs)
01:22, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
The image used says that it is copyrighted in the label. Wouldn't that make it ineligible for use here? Sperril ( talk) 21:17, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
This article is of questionable notability for one, and is written in a completely ridiculous manner for two. Not only does it read like an advertisement, but it's been placed in the "cognitive architectures" category in the article List of artificial intelligence projects. It's obvious to anyone that someone involved with the creation and/or marketing of this software has been active on Wikipedia. I propose deletion or heavy modification.