Virtual Insanity was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 31, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Might want to take out the part about the toaster... funny though —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.159.9 ( talk) 07:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
The "interpretation" of the music video is completely POV. References are made which are only determined by this wikipedians' POV. Wikipedia is definitely not a format for discussing an individuals own interpretation of music videos. Unless the band has publicly claimed that this was the intention of the music video, it seems very unencyclopedic and unscholarly to assume that this music vidoe is an opponent for, among other things, animal testing. Blah blah blah. You get the idea. 69.17.136.13 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Bonnar 69.17.136.13 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
This page has, at different times, given two different explainations for how the video was made (moving walls, moving floor), neither of them referenced. It would be good to have this section back, but since there is disagreement, there needs to be references. Keithmahoney 21:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The 4th wall may refer to the ceiling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.15.2 ( talk) 23:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
The song's being used on the commercial for Space Week on the Science Channel. Which may or may not warrant a mention. I'll let my fellow wikipedians decide. -- MightyGiant 22:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Why isn't it mentioned anywhere on this page that the song won a Grammy in 1997 for Best Pop Performance By A Duo Or Group With Vocal? Seems like a pretty big oversight to me... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.192.27 ( talk) 23:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Electricmaster ( talk · contribs) 14:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Esculenta ( talk · contribs) 17:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'll review this article. I'll have a full review here within a few days, but I notice there a few bits of the article that currently lack a citation (3rd & 4th paragraphs & final sentence of "Composition"; 2nd para of "Content and ideation"), so it would be great if you could source these.
Esculenta (
talk)
17:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Here's my review. Although the article is quite well-written and comprehensive, there are some major issues with sourcing/original research, as described below. Checking the article history, it seems that these OR additions were pre-existing in the article before you started improving it. The spot checks are just a sample; I'd recommended checking all of the text/citations that weren't added by you to ensure they're compliant with Wikipedia sourcing standards. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. Esculenta ( talk) 16:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
images
spotchecks
Should we mention that Virtual Insanity had become a meme song in the intro? 2600:100C:A20C:6C0F:D511:E9CD:CE9C:59C7 ( talk) 05:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Virtual Insanity was nominated as a Music good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 31, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Might want to take out the part about the toaster... funny though —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.220.159.9 ( talk) 07:27, 10 April 2009 (UTC)
The "interpretation" of the music video is completely POV. References are made which are only determined by this wikipedians' POV. Wikipedia is definitely not a format for discussing an individuals own interpretation of music videos. Unless the band has publicly claimed that this was the intention of the music video, it seems very unencyclopedic and unscholarly to assume that this music vidoe is an opponent for, among other things, animal testing. Blah blah blah. You get the idea. 69.17.136.13 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)Bonnar 69.17.136.13 01:14, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
This page has, at different times, given two different explainations for how the video was made (moving walls, moving floor), neither of them referenced. It would be good to have this section back, but since there is disagreement, there needs to be references. Keithmahoney 21:22, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
The 4th wall may refer to the ceiling. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.242.15.2 ( talk) 23:35, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
The song's being used on the commercial for Space Week on the Science Channel. Which may or may not warrant a mention. I'll let my fellow wikipedians decide. -- MightyGiant 22:29, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Why isn't it mentioned anywhere on this page that the song won a Grammy in 1997 for Best Pop Performance By A Duo Or Group With Vocal? Seems like a pretty big oversight to me... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.128.192.27 ( talk) 23:08, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: Electricmaster ( talk · contribs) 14:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Esculenta ( talk · contribs) 17:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'll review this article. I'll have a full review here within a few days, but I notice there a few bits of the article that currently lack a citation (3rd & 4th paragraphs & final sentence of "Composition"; 2nd para of "Content and ideation"), so it would be great if you could source these.
Esculenta (
talk)
17:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Here's my review. Although the article is quite well-written and comprehensive, there are some major issues with sourcing/original research, as described below. Checking the article history, it seems that these OR additions were pre-existing in the article before you started improving it. The spot checks are just a sample; I'd recommended checking all of the text/citations that weren't added by you to ensure they're compliant with Wikipedia sourcing standards. Let me know how you'd like to proceed. Esculenta ( talk) 16:39, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
images
spotchecks
Should we mention that Virtual Insanity had become a meme song in the intro? 2600:100C:A20C:6C0F:D511:E9CD:CE9C:59C7 ( talk) 05:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)