![]() | Virginia State Route 7 Business (Purcellville) was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||
|
I made the following changes for the following reasons.
Now the article just needs to be expanded. The RD section is a sentence fragment that should be a paragraph at least. This paragraph can be cited to the current paper VDOT map and a set of driving directions on Google Maps. A junction list can be created using the information from the VDOT report already cited in the article. Those two sections would make this a Start-Class article. Add a history section cited to reliable sources like old VDOT maps or old newspaper articles (try http://news.google.com and their archives search function, for example) and this would be a C- or B-Class article depending on the quality of the writing and sourcing. Imzadi 1979 → 17:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, as promised in my edit summary, I'm going to detail the why for my last edit to fix the junction list.
{{VAint
and then ended with }}
after the last parameter for that row, in this case the |notes=
.Now, one final thing for full MOS:RJL compliance: the county column needs to be removed. Since all of the junctions are in the same county, that section of the Manual of Style says to omit the column and replace it with a note above the table. That can be done like this. Imzadi 1979 → 23:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Fredddie ( talk · contribs) 17:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
( stalking) I had a brief look at this, and I can endorse Fredddie's opinion that this does not meet the GA criteria. Furthermore, I'd suggest it's a prime candidate to be deleted, as it appears not to cite any significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources and I'd focus on getting sources such as significant news or book sources in the article ASAP. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
![]() | Virginia State Route 7 Business (Purcellville) was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||
|
I made the following changes for the following reasons.
Now the article just needs to be expanded. The RD section is a sentence fragment that should be a paragraph at least. This paragraph can be cited to the current paper VDOT map and a set of driving directions on Google Maps. A junction list can be created using the information from the VDOT report already cited in the article. Those two sections would make this a Start-Class article. Add a history section cited to reliable sources like old VDOT maps or old newspaper articles (try http://news.google.com and their archives search function, for example) and this would be a C- or B-Class article depending on the quality of the writing and sourcing. Imzadi 1979 → 17:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, as promised in my edit summary, I'm going to detail the why for my last edit to fix the junction list.
{{VAint
and then ended with }}
after the last parameter for that row, in this case the |notes=
.Now, one final thing for full MOS:RJL compliance: the county column needs to be removed. Since all of the junctions are in the same county, that section of the Manual of Style says to omit the column and replace it with a note above the table. That can be done like this. Imzadi 1979 → 23:19, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Fredddie ( talk · contribs) 17:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)
( stalking) I had a brief look at this, and I can endorse Fredddie's opinion that this does not meet the GA criteria. Furthermore, I'd suggest it's a prime candidate to be deleted, as it appears not to cite any significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources and I'd focus on getting sources such as significant news or book sources in the article ASAP. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:54, 5 October 2013 (UTC)