This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Italy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

The following text was deleted:

"At this time, before the English style of naturalistic landscaping gained in popularity, the most pleasant imaginable vista from a garden was that of orderly husbandry, where the hand of man had tamed the wanton disorder and danger that Nature represented."

To an unprepared eye this looked like "original" research, I suppose. Extraordinary. I wonder what seemed "wrong" to someone. -- Wetman 10:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply

I think it's been romev 'cause it sounded a bit pompous and unencyclopedical. -- Attilios 10:46, 12 November 2006 (UTC) reply