This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Land vehicles / Technology / Weaponry / European / Russian & Soviet Start‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Military land vehicles task force Military science, technology, and theory task force Weaponry task force European military history task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force

@ FDW777: please stop removing article references and afterwards information it was referencing. This violates WP:Vandalism.-- PsichoPuzo ( talk) 22:38, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

I refer you to these comments, as well as the earlier ones in the same thread regarding the unreliability of the references you keep restoring. FDW777 ( talk) 22:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

For maximum clarity, they have been deemed unreliable at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 320#defence-blog.com and Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 344#armyrecognition.com. FDW777 ( talk) 22:43, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Actually no. They're not. The talk was not closed and a couple of unreferenced unproved statements without any discussion are not representing any consensus.-- PsichoPuzo ( talk) 22:48, 5 January 2022 (UTC) reply

Discussions at RSN don't require formal closing, especially when there is no doubt the websites are nothing more than a hobbyist's personal website with no reputation for fact-checking or accuracy. FDW777 ( talk) 13:50, 7 January 2022 (UTC) reply