This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Brazil and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
I think this
recent change is wrongheaded, but I want to give someone a chance to respond before I edit:
Most obviously, if we are going to describe him as "Czechoslovakian", we should capitalize that word.
But I'm dubious on calling him "Czechoslovakian". He was a citizen (born just after the foundation of that country), but I'm not even sure he spoke Czech or Slovak natively. He was from a German-speaking Jewish background (and, because of the rise of Nazism, he left the region entirely while still in his teens). Blithely calling him "Czechoslovakian" seems a bit misleading.
Also, I can't imagine why the adjective "self-taught" was removed from the lead.
He was a Czechoslovak, he had Czechoslovak citizenship, he spoke english, german and czech fluently. He left Prague in 1939 (his 29 not a teen). It is correct to write he was a Czechoslovakian. He is listed in the list of Czechs. Maybe we should change it to "self taught philosopher of czechoslovakian citizenship"
If he left Czechoslovakia at the age of 29, then our biography is quite wrong. Given his Jewish background, I have no doubt that the date of 1939 for his departure is at least approximately correct. Our article says he was born 1920.
[1], which appears to be an utterly reliable source for the dates, agrees with our article.
I don't have a problem with him being described as Czechoslovakian, but I think that his being from a Jewish background also merits mention in the lead. From what I've read (and I'm by no means expert), it seems to me he was far more profoundly (secular) Jewish than Czech. -
Jmabel |
Talk19:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The biography isn't wrong: Flusser was born in 1920, left Prague in 1939 at the age of 18 or 19 – a teen, literally – and emigrated to Britain with the family of Gustav Barth, his future father-in-law, and then to Brazil in 1940 (his first son was born in 1943 already in Brazil). It's unthinkable not to mention in the lead that he was a Jew. That's the essential fact for his life story at least at that point. Flusser is quite the model of the "stateless intellectual" – the emphasis on his "Czechoslovakian" citizenship seems rather misleading as he spent the whole of his productive intellectual life outside Czechoslovakia.
RodC03:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)reply
FYI, in april someone created a another page on Vilém Flusser spelled
Villem Flusser. I already wrote a note into a discussion page of that article that it should be merged. --
Tomash13:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class.
BetacommandBot16:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brazil, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Brazil and
related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrazilWikipedia:WikiProject BrazilTemplate:WikiProject BrazilBrazil articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to
philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
I think this
recent change is wrongheaded, but I want to give someone a chance to respond before I edit:
Most obviously, if we are going to describe him as "Czechoslovakian", we should capitalize that word.
But I'm dubious on calling him "Czechoslovakian". He was a citizen (born just after the foundation of that country), but I'm not even sure he spoke Czech or Slovak natively. He was from a German-speaking Jewish background (and, because of the rise of Nazism, he left the region entirely while still in his teens). Blithely calling him "Czechoslovakian" seems a bit misleading.
Also, I can't imagine why the adjective "self-taught" was removed from the lead.
He was a Czechoslovak, he had Czechoslovak citizenship, he spoke english, german and czech fluently. He left Prague in 1939 (his 29 not a teen). It is correct to write he was a Czechoslovakian. He is listed in the list of Czechs. Maybe we should change it to "self taught philosopher of czechoslovakian citizenship"
If he left Czechoslovakia at the age of 29, then our biography is quite wrong. Given his Jewish background, I have no doubt that the date of 1939 for his departure is at least approximately correct. Our article says he was born 1920.
[1], which appears to be an utterly reliable source for the dates, agrees with our article.
I don't have a problem with him being described as Czechoslovakian, but I think that his being from a Jewish background also merits mention in the lead. From what I've read (and I'm by no means expert), it seems to me he was far more profoundly (secular) Jewish than Czech. -
Jmabel |
Talk19:50, 3 February 2007 (UTC)reply
The biography isn't wrong: Flusser was born in 1920, left Prague in 1939 at the age of 18 or 19 – a teen, literally – and emigrated to Britain with the family of Gustav Barth, his future father-in-law, and then to Brazil in 1940 (his first son was born in 1943 already in Brazil). It's unthinkable not to mention in the lead that he was a Jew. That's the essential fact for his life story at least at that point. Flusser is quite the model of the "stateless intellectual" – the emphasis on his "Czechoslovakian" citizenship seems rather misleading as he spent the whole of his productive intellectual life outside Czechoslovakia.
RodC03:56, 4 February 2007 (UTC)reply
FYI, in april someone created a another page on Vilém Flusser spelled
Villem Flusser. I already wrote a note into a discussion page of that article that it should be merged. --
Tomash13:04, 28 July 2007 (UTC)reply
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class.
BetacommandBot16:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)reply