Daily page views Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. There is more info on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Australia: Victoria / Sports / Australian rules football Low‑importance Victorian Amateur Football Association is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by WikiProject Australian rules football (assessed as Mid-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

A bit of editing needs to be done on which clubs belong to which sections. It appears that every club not in Section A is in Section C.

Furthermore, there is no mention of Sections D1, D2, D3 and D4. -- Brebster 07:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC) reply

This quote:

Almost all of the clubs are private school based where by the 'old boys' from the school play (sometimes are coerced to play through employment/scholarship incentives). Suburban teams such as Oakleigh, Ormond and Hampton find it hard to compete against the private school teams.

is poorly worded and, IMO incorrect. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.101.155.174 ( talk) 02:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC) reply

Whether or not it's actually right, it's an opinion. I've neutralised the paragraph and taken the opinion out. AFL-Cool ( talk) 09:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC) reply