This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
For one, vibecession seems unlikely to comprise a meaningful part of historical analyses of this moment a decade from now. This analysis smacks of recency bias and only provides one example: that of the current moment.
For two the article is unbalanced and neglects other analyses from different POV (See
here) that might argue that for example the perspective that the economy is weak is a reflection of a section of the population that is *actually* not doing well while other sectors are doing great.
agree. this should be deleted. The author page even redirects here. No relevance at all. This should be no more than a note (with opposing views) in a larger article about the political issue it is contextualized.
Gcbwiki (
talk) 16:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
For one, vibecession seems unlikely to comprise a meaningful part of historical analyses of this moment a decade from now. This analysis smacks of recency bias and only provides one example: that of the current moment.
For two the article is unbalanced and neglects other analyses from different POV (See
here) that might argue that for example the perspective that the economy is weak is a reflection of a section of the population that is *actually* not doing well while other sectors are doing great.
agree. this should be deleted. The author page even redirects here. No relevance at all. This should be no more than a note (with opposing views) in a larger article about the political issue it is contextualized.
Gcbwiki (
talk) 16:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)reply