This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Via (electronics) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maybe add diagrams and pictures for all three (standard, buried, and blind) Matejhowell 15:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I would like to sugest a link to this site: http://www.micromultek.com.br/RigidCircuit/microvia.asp It contains a good ilustration to several tipes os vias. -- Akira - Cleber Akira Nakandakare 21:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
How about adding the definition that "via" is derived from (it's an acronym. . . ) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
192.249.47.163 (
talk)
16:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I suspect that "vertical interconnect access" was made up after the event, as I can't find any corroboration of it that isn't an obvious copy of Wikipedia. Why make up a clunky, redundant acronym like that when there is a perfectly good Latin word via (way) that it is more likely to be derived from? -- Heron ( talk) 12:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I have just removed the following from the article inserted by User:Binarysequence:
I have several problems with this, but most importantly I am disputing the accuracy.
— It looks like the above issues were dealt with, and the diagram returned. Additional concerns:
JimJJewett ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Both integrated circuit and circuit board vias are covered by the article. The only similarity between these types are function: connecting things on different levels. Everything else is different once the details are considered. Perhaps there should be a separate article for vias in ICs and those in circuit boards? 99Electrons ( talk) 05:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Via (electronics) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Maybe add diagrams and pictures for all three (standard, buried, and blind) Matejhowell 15:25, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
I would like to sugest a link to this site: http://www.micromultek.com.br/RigidCircuit/microvia.asp It contains a good ilustration to several tipes os vias. -- Akira - Cleber Akira Nakandakare 21:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
How about adding the definition that "via" is derived from (it's an acronym. . . ) —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
192.249.47.163 (
talk)
16:37, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
I suspect that "vertical interconnect access" was made up after the event, as I can't find any corroboration of it that isn't an obvious copy of Wikipedia. Why make up a clunky, redundant acronym like that when there is a perfectly good Latin word via (way) that it is more likely to be derived from? -- Heron ( talk) 12:48, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
I have just removed the following from the article inserted by User:Binarysequence:
I have several problems with this, but most importantly I am disputing the accuracy.
— It looks like the above issues were dealt with, and the diagram returned. Additional concerns:
JimJJewett ( talk) — Preceding undated comment added 23:59, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Both integrated circuit and circuit board vias are covered by the article. The only similarity between these types are function: connecting things on different levels. Everything else is different once the details are considered. Perhaps there should be a separate article for vias in ICs and those in circuit boards? 99Electrons ( talk) 05:06, 8 January 2019 (UTC)