This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize is an honor, but it is not official or even prestigious. Any national legislator or about a third of the university professors in the world can make a nomination, and there have been as many as 140 some years. Nominators are requested to keep their nominations secret, so it's only those wishing publicity who make announcements, and more often it is impossible to verify. I see no reason to keep it. No offense to the subject, this is a general Nobel Peace Prize "nominees" issue. - Will Beback · † · 09:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
'Pešić engaged in the struggle for democracy, peace, and human rights' part is heavily biased.
Most of people in Serbia think opposite about her, so, as you have not provided any other sources except her political organization website, this part should be removed. I will edit this page in a week or so if you do not supply proof that democracy/peace/human rights are the things which she fights for. Petkowsky ( talk) 20:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
As I promised, article edited, POV removed. Do NOT revert unless you have valid sources Petkowsky ( talk) 13:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Petkowsky ( talk) 13:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Petkowsky ( talk) 16:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I left Marko.vujacic's version until dispute is solved. POV should stay meanwhile. Petkowsky ( talk) 19:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, I am coming from your posting at the Third Opinion page. I am presently reading the talk page and articles; I will give my opinion shortly. Lazulilasher ( talk) 15:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
First, I applaud the editors for requesting a third opinion.
The dispute concerns wording construed by an editor as violating NPOV. Wording should be neutral and factually oriented. Example: "Lazulilasher got a barnstar for his work in mediation" is preferable to: "Lazulilasher, outstanding editor of Wikipedia, frequently provides excellent third opinions; hence, he was awarded many barnstars". My opinion is that the awards be listed, with no numerical modifiers like "many".
Wording should strive to remain neutral; allow the reader to come to his own conclusion. That is, there is no need to say she is a "noted peace advocate"; if facts back this up, then the astute reader will arrive at this thought himself. I hope this helps. Kindest regards, Lazulilasher ( talk) 16:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
As promised, I edited article according to discussion above. Please provide feedback on this version. Petkowsky ( talk) 15:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for unsigned edit, i forgot to login;
As soon as references will be provided we should add it to article
Regards Petkowsky ( talk) 11:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
I edited last change made by 93.86.190.101;
Regards Petkowsky ( talk) 13:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Reverted deletion made by 79.175.98.40;
Petkowsky ( talk) 12:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vesna Pešić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Being nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize is an honor, but it is not official or even prestigious. Any national legislator or about a third of the university professors in the world can make a nomination, and there have been as many as 140 some years. Nominators are requested to keep their nominations secret, so it's only those wishing publicity who make announcements, and more often it is impossible to verify. I see no reason to keep it. No offense to the subject, this is a general Nobel Peace Prize "nominees" issue. - Will Beback · † · 09:20, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
'Pešić engaged in the struggle for democracy, peace, and human rights' part is heavily biased.
Most of people in Serbia think opposite about her, so, as you have not provided any other sources except her political organization website, this part should be removed. I will edit this page in a week or so if you do not supply proof that democracy/peace/human rights are the things which she fights for. Petkowsky ( talk) 20:45, 5 October 2008 (UTC)
As I promised, article edited, POV removed. Do NOT revert unless you have valid sources Petkowsky ( talk) 13:07, 12 October 2008 (UTC)
Petkowsky ( talk) 13:12, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Petkowsky ( talk) 16:22, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
I left Marko.vujacic's version until dispute is solved. POV should stay meanwhile. Petkowsky ( talk) 19:16, 14 October 2008 (UTC)
Greetings, I am coming from your posting at the Third Opinion page. I am presently reading the talk page and articles; I will give my opinion shortly. Lazulilasher ( talk) 15:45, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
First, I applaud the editors for requesting a third opinion.
The dispute concerns wording construed by an editor as violating NPOV. Wording should be neutral and factually oriented. Example: "Lazulilasher got a barnstar for his work in mediation" is preferable to: "Lazulilasher, outstanding editor of Wikipedia, frequently provides excellent third opinions; hence, he was awarded many barnstars". My opinion is that the awards be listed, with no numerical modifiers like "many".
Wording should strive to remain neutral; allow the reader to come to his own conclusion. That is, there is no need to say she is a "noted peace advocate"; if facts back this up, then the astute reader will arrive at this thought himself. I hope this helps. Kindest regards, Lazulilasher ( talk) 16:04, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
As promised, I edited article according to discussion above. Please provide feedback on this version. Petkowsky ( talk) 15:46, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Sorry for unsigned edit, i forgot to login;
As soon as references will be provided we should add it to article
Regards Petkowsky ( talk) 11:28, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
I edited last change made by 93.86.190.101;
Regards Petkowsky ( talk) 13:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Reverted deletion made by 79.175.98.40;
Petkowsky ( talk) 12:00, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vesna Pešić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:58, 20 July 2016 (UTC)