![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review and quotations collated, rewritten and edited from available public information (as per references and external links).-- Daubmir ( talk) 16:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how much "rewritten" this has to be to not be a copyright violation. I picked up a random paragraph and searched and got a single hit on google. That's unusual. (John User:Jwy talk) 17:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
I have just added a few article issues tags to this article, I could have added a lot more. First, the tone is more like that of a term paper or essay than an encyclopedic article: Sebald's melancholy doppelgänger wanders..., ...prisoner of the vertiginous unreliability of memory itself, etc. It is littered with peacock terms: Beautifully written..., Sebald is a profound, original writer.... The lead section is way too long as is the Excerpts & Commentary section. I suggest that interested editors seek assistance from the Books Project. – ukexpat ( talk) 16:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Review and quotations collated, rewritten and edited from available public information (as per references and external links).-- Daubmir ( talk) 16:28, 27 November 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure how much "rewritten" this has to be to not be a copyright violation. I picked up a random paragraph and searched and got a single hit on google. That's unusual. (John User:Jwy talk) 17:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
I have just added a few article issues tags to this article, I could have added a lot more. First, the tone is more like that of a term paper or essay than an encyclopedic article: Sebald's melancholy doppelgänger wanders..., ...prisoner of the vertiginous unreliability of memory itself, etc. It is littered with peacock terms: Beautifully written..., Sebald is a profound, original writer.... The lead section is way too long as is the Excerpts & Commentary section. I suggest that interested editors seek assistance from the Books Project. – ukexpat ( talk) 16:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)