This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ventura Freeway article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2010. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom. . |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The entire Ventura Freeway is not built to freeway standards ...
This doesn't explain why it is not considered a freeway. If it were not to be built to Interstate standards, then what would be present along the highway are at-grade junctions, and median crossovers. That is my opinion. Despite the fact that the route is more likely to be a freeway, it may have been inconsistent enough to have be built upon Interstate standards. I do consider the Ventura Freeway built to those standards. 2600:1700:8A32:B530:8561:2B66:1D13:FD67 ( talk) 01:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
The statement was posted when there were still at-grade intersections at La Conchita and Mussel Shoals. The best indicator now would be if all the "Begin Freeway" and "End Freeway" signs were removed from the route. (I just checked Google Street View, and I did not see any of them there anymore) Of course, Wikipedia's policy on verifiability only applies to information within Wikipedia articles -- there is no penalty for the omission of information. So in either case, we can probably remove the statement now. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 04:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Ventura Freeway article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives:
1Auto-archiving period: 365 days
![]() |
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 March 2010. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by nom. . |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The entire Ventura Freeway is not built to freeway standards ...
This doesn't explain why it is not considered a freeway. If it were not to be built to Interstate standards, then what would be present along the highway are at-grade junctions, and median crossovers. That is my opinion. Despite the fact that the route is more likely to be a freeway, it may have been inconsistent enough to have be built upon Interstate standards. I do consider the Ventura Freeway built to those standards. 2600:1700:8A32:B530:8561:2B66:1D13:FD67 ( talk) 01:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
The statement was posted when there were still at-grade intersections at La Conchita and Mussel Shoals. The best indicator now would be if all the "Begin Freeway" and "End Freeway" signs were removed from the route. (I just checked Google Street View, and I did not see any of them there anymore) Of course, Wikipedia's policy on verifiability only applies to information within Wikipedia articles -- there is no penalty for the omission of information. So in either case, we can probably remove the statement now. Zzyzx11 ( talk) 04:49, 20 March 2019 (UTC)