This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friedrich Nietzsche describes the velleity of an artist as ...
Surely he was writing in german and using a german term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.2.4.137 ( talk) 11:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The word in German is in fact Velleität. There are other problems with this section, however: Nietzsche does not have a "free-will theorem" (whatever that is), and describing him as "championing" will to power is quite strange. Crespodm ( talk) 17:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
The whole article is strange, very badly written, in fact it's almost complete nonsense. What exactly constitutes velleity is surely a matter of perspective or opinion. There is no discernable concept which can be isolated from any other term. A whim or a fancy would suffice.-- Fecknuts ( talk) 06:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This concept seems to be suspiciously like velleity. Since it's been proposed for either merger or deletion, this might be the better target for an otherwise non-notable fringe topic. Bearian ( talk) 16:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Is this a mutually exclusive word? Tiger27 ( talk) 15:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 June 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Friedrich Nietzsche describes the velleity of an artist as ...
Surely he was writing in german and using a german term. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 139.2.4.137 ( talk) 11:02, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
The word in German is in fact Velleität. There are other problems with this section, however: Nietzsche does not have a "free-will theorem" (whatever that is), and describing him as "championing" will to power is quite strange. Crespodm ( talk) 17:36, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
The whole article is strange, very badly written, in fact it's almost complete nonsense. What exactly constitutes velleity is surely a matter of perspective or opinion. There is no discernable concept which can be isolated from any other term. A whim or a fancy would suffice.-- Fecknuts ( talk) 06:26, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
This concept seems to be suspiciously like velleity. Since it's been proposed for either merger or deletion, this might be the better target for an otherwise non-notable fringe topic. Bearian ( talk) 16:48, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
Is this a mutually exclusive word? Tiger27 ( talk) 15:58, 14 January 2017 (UTC)