This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Norway This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles Football Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

So, in order to dodge a 50% sell-on clause, instead of paying 5m kronor for Gunnarsson, they bought him and a kid (who was presumably worth nothing) and pretended that most of the fee was for the kid? I ask because it's not actually stated explicitly in the article, you have to piece it together. It doesn't help that part 1 of the story is in the lede and part 2 below the contents, when *all* of the story should be below the contents, and the lede used as a summary. -- 81.136.143.173 ( talk) 15:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC) I've now tried to rewrote the lead. I hope it is more clear now. Mentoz86 ( talk) 08:52, 21 November 2012 (UTC) reply