![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hello @
KoA: I don't know what First was already mentioned, second contradicts other sources.
means. After
Special:MobileDiff/1182897194 there is no mention of either Traynor or Wang. Traynor is a 2020 review which gives a specific citation – Wang – for absence from A. mellifera. Chantawannakul is the only other secondary source in the article. Although it does support absence you didn't cite it, it is 2016 and it gives only the authors' opinion on absence. Chantawannakul also supports absence from that host across the world not only in China. A 2020 review contradicting 1987, 1999 and 2016 sources and a 2020 primary source is not a bad thing.
Invasive Spices (
talk)
23:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
V. underwoodi remains a specialist on A. cerana. . .. We can't say V. underwoodi does not infest A. mellifera based on that alone. Other sources list the four different species it has been found on instead. Had they addressed the previous literature and indicated there was a misidentification or something else, then maybe, but there would be a bit to address just for that one bee species.
detected in different bee species in Southern Asia and found exclusively in A. cerana in China(my bold). That is what the article currently reflects. KoA ( talk) 00:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
V. underwoodi is restricted to A. cerana, A. nigrocincta, and A. nuluensis.but you are correct that the table from the same paper contradicts that. In any case 2020 >>>> 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1999. Invasive Spices ( talk) 20:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Hello @
KoA: I don't know what First was already mentioned, second contradicts other sources.
means. After
Special:MobileDiff/1182897194 there is no mention of either Traynor or Wang. Traynor is a 2020 review which gives a specific citation – Wang – for absence from A. mellifera. Chantawannakul is the only other secondary source in the article. Although it does support absence you didn't cite it, it is 2016 and it gives only the authors' opinion on absence. Chantawannakul also supports absence from that host across the world not only in China. A 2020 review contradicting 1987, 1999 and 2016 sources and a 2020 primary source is not a bad thing.
Invasive Spices (
talk)
23:03, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
V. underwoodi remains a specialist on A. cerana. . .. We can't say V. underwoodi does not infest A. mellifera based on that alone. Other sources list the four different species it has been found on instead. Had they addressed the previous literature and indicated there was a misidentification or something else, then maybe, but there would be a bit to address just for that one bee species.
detected in different bee species in Southern Asia and found exclusively in A. cerana in China(my bold). That is what the article currently reflects. KoA ( talk) 00:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
V. underwoodi is restricted to A. cerana, A. nigrocincta, and A. nuluensis.but you are correct that the table from the same paper contradicts that. In any case 2020 >>>> 2016 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1999. Invasive Spices ( talk) 20:18, 3 November 2023 (UTC)